Skip to comments.
Troops for border sought
Washington Times ^
| 6/19/02
| Dave Boyer
Posted on 06/19/2002 12:11:29 AM PDT by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:54:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
Conservative lawmakers called on President Bush to deploy thousands of troops along U.S. borders, saying the homeland security plan that the White House delivered yesterday to Congress would take years to crack down on illegal immigration.
"Our nation's border security is our homeland's Achilles' heel," said Rep. Jim Ramstad, Minnesota Republican. "This situation must be corrected immediately if we're serious about preventing terrorism."
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: immigrant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-175 next last
1
posted on
06/19/2002 12:11:29 AM PDT
by
kattracks
To: kattracks
I hope the nation is ready for martial law because that is the ONLY way the military is authorized to assume civil police powers in this country.
To: Texasforever
Did Bush impose martial law when he deployed the National Guard on the borders?
3
posted on
06/19/2002 12:23:47 AM PDT
by
sarcasm
To: sarcasm
Did Bush impose martial law when he deployed the National Guard on the borders? He violated the constitution.
To: kattracks
"I want an explanation of these 'cultural and historical' reasons why we can't protect our nation's borders," said Rep. Tom TancredoThe logical and reality based reasons were not sufficient apparently.
How many troops?
Were do we get the manpower?
Who pays?
What restrictions will Americans be forced to adhere to?
5
posted on
06/19/2002 12:25:33 AM PDT
by
PRND21
To: Texasforever
Are you calling for his impeachment?
6
posted on
06/19/2002 12:28:18 AM PDT
by
sarcasm
To: sarcasm
Are you calling for his impeachment? No, are you in favor of martial law?
To: Texasforever
"I hope the nation is ready for martial law because that is the ONLY way the military is authorized to assume civil police powers in this country. "
yea, but most of the talking experts don't know this?
We could pull the troops from europe I think but congress would have to do some law changin first !
To: sarcasm
The 450 national guard troops were placed under control of the INS. That put them out of command and control of the DOD. That is constitutionally sound.
To: Texasforever
Shouldn't a President who willfully violates the Constitution be impeached?
10
posted on
06/19/2002 12:34:20 AM PDT
by
sarcasm
To: PRND21
How many troops?
At least 100,000 !
Were do we get the manpower?
Pull them from europe !
Who pays?
We pay !
What restrictions will Americans be forced to adhere to?
The left would be in a fenzy but saying the troops are getting desert training might work to shut them up?
To: america-rules
Yep. The first would be a repeal of the posse comitatus act. THEN watch the militia groups howl.
To: america-rules
I know I've said this many, many times on FR, but I think more people need to hear it:
Line the entire border with nuclear waste!
To: Texasforever
Perhaps you missed this:
In a petition to the president, Mr. Tancredo's group said the post-Civil War Posse Comitatus Act and later congressional provisions allowed the president to deploy the military to help enforce state and federal laws
14
posted on
06/19/2002 12:41:17 AM PDT
by
sarcasm
To: sarcasm
Shouldn't a President who willfully violates the Constitution be impeached? Shouldnt posters that deliberately lie be banned? I actually went and did my research. The 450 NG troops were NOT under DOD control They were assigned to the INS. Nice try.
To: kattracks; Texasforever
The illegal invasion is planned and orchestrated from abroad. I've had an in-your-face encounter on more than one occasion with supporters of the invasion telling me it's too late for us. I wish there was someway the Bush administration could communicate that they know what's up and that they have a plan. It would set a great many minds at ease.
16
posted on
06/19/2002 12:43:59 AM PDT
by
Hostage
To: sarcasm
In a petition to the president, Mr. Tancredo's group said the post-Civil War Posse Comitatus Act and later congressional provisions allowed the president to deploy the military to help enforce state and federal laws Then I WOULD BE VERY INTERESTED IN THAT DOCUMENTATION. This idiot Tancredo is just NOT credo. I assume then that you supported Delta force involvement at Waco?
To: Texasforever
Martial law for illigal immigrants, what is wrong with that? It is a perfect matter of border and Federal/Military jurisdiction.
To: lavaroise
Martial law for illigal immigrants, what is wrong with that? It is a perfect matter of border and Federal/Military jurisdiction. Sorry but you don't understand a dammed thing about martial law.
To: Texasforever
So, by your logic, circumvention of a Constitutional prohibition is acceptable as long as your guy does it. How Clintonian.
20
posted on
06/19/2002 12:56:17 AM PDT
by
sarcasm
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-175 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson