Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Troops for border sought
Washington Times ^ | 6/19/02 | Dave Boyer

Posted on 06/19/2002 12:11:29 AM PDT by kattracks

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:54:48 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Conservative lawmakers called on President Bush to deploy thousands of troops along U.S. borders, saying the homeland security plan that the White House delivered yesterday to Congress would take years to crack down on illegal immigration.

"Our nation's border security is our homeland's Achilles' heel," said Rep. Jim Ramstad, Minnesota Republican. "This situation must be corrected immediately if we're serious about preventing terrorism."


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: immigrant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

1 posted on 06/19/2002 12:11:29 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I hope the nation is ready for martial law because that is the ONLY way the military is authorized to assume civil police powers in this country.
2 posted on 06/19/2002 12:15:49 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Did Bush impose martial law when he deployed the National Guard on the borders?
3 posted on 06/19/2002 12:23:47 AM PDT by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Did Bush impose martial law when he deployed the National Guard on the borders?

He violated the constitution.

4 posted on 06/19/2002 12:25:00 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"I want an explanation of these 'cultural and historical' reasons why we can't protect our nation's borders," said Rep. Tom Tancredo

The logical and reality based reasons were not sufficient apparently.
How many troops?
Were do we get the manpower?
Who pays?
What restrictions will Americans be forced to adhere to?

5 posted on 06/19/2002 12:25:33 AM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Are you calling for his impeachment?
6 posted on 06/19/2002 12:28:18 AM PDT by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Are you calling for his impeachment?

No, are you in favor of martial law?

7 posted on 06/19/2002 12:29:16 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
"I hope the nation is ready for martial law because that is the ONLY way the military is authorized to assume civil police powers in this country. "

yea, but most of the talking experts don't know this?

We could pull the troops from europe I think but congress would have to do some law changin first !

8 posted on 06/19/2002 12:31:22 AM PDT by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
The 450 national guard troops were placed under control of the INS. That put them out of command and control of the DOD. That is constitutionally sound.
9 posted on 06/19/2002 12:32:57 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Shouldn't a President who willfully violates the Constitution be impeached?
10 posted on 06/19/2002 12:34:20 AM PDT by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PRND21
How many troops?
At least 100,000 !

Were do we get the manpower?
Pull them from europe !

Who pays?
We pay !

What restrictions will Americans be forced to adhere to?

The left would be in a fenzy but saying the troops are getting desert training might work to shut them up?

11 posted on 06/19/2002 12:34:21 AM PDT by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: america-rules
Yep. The first would be a repeal of the posse comitatus act. THEN watch the militia groups howl.
12 posted on 06/19/2002 12:36:55 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: america-rules
I know I've said this many, many times on FR, but I think more people need to hear it:

Line the entire border with nuclear waste!

13 posted on 06/19/2002 12:40:30 AM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Perhaps you missed this:

In a petition to the president, Mr. Tancredo's group said the post-Civil War Posse Comitatus Act and later congressional provisions allowed the president to deploy the military to help enforce state and federal laws

14 posted on 06/19/2002 12:41:17 AM PDT by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Shouldn't a President who willfully violates the Constitution be impeached?

Shouldn’t posters that deliberately lie be banned? I actually went and did my research. The 450 NG troops were NOT under DOD control They were assigned to the INS. Nice try.

15 posted on 06/19/2002 12:41:48 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; Texasforever
The illegal invasion is planned and orchestrated from abroad. I've had an in-your-face encounter on more than one occasion with supporters of the invasion telling me it's too late for us. I wish there was someway the Bush administration could communicate that they know what's up and that they have a plan. It would set a great many minds at ease.
16 posted on 06/19/2002 12:43:59 AM PDT by Hostage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
In a petition to the president, Mr. Tancredo's group said the post-Civil War Posse Comitatus Act and later congressional provisions allowed the president to deploy the military to help enforce state and federal laws

Then I WOULD BE VERY INTERESTED IN THAT DOCUMENTATION. This idiot Tancredo is just NOT credo. I assume then that you supported Delta force involvement at Waco?

17 posted on 06/19/2002 12:44:35 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Martial law for illigal immigrants, what is wrong with that? It is a perfect matter of border and Federal/Military jurisdiction.
18 posted on 06/19/2002 12:45:35 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise
Martial law for illigal immigrants, what is wrong with that? It is a perfect matter of border and Federal/Military jurisdiction.

Sorry but you don't understand a dammed thing about martial law.

19 posted on 06/19/2002 12:47:57 AM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
So, by your logic, circumvention of a Constitutional prohibition is acceptable as long as your guy does it. How Clintonian.
20 posted on 06/19/2002 12:56:17 AM PDT by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-175 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson