Posted on 06/18/2002 7:00:08 PM PDT by Pokey78
MOHAMMED AL-GHOUL, a 22-year-old Palestinian student from the Al Faraa refugee camp on the West Bank, strapped explosives packed with nails to his body and set out early yesterday to sneak through the Israeli security net into Jerusalem. At 8am he boarded a rush-hour bus crowded with high school pupils and office workers. He blew himself up before he had even bought a ticket. The blast lifted the vehicle into the air, ripped off its roof, and sent bodies flying through the windows. The bomber and 19 other people died, many of them teenagers. The driver of bus number 32 sat dead in his seat, his hands still gripping the wheel. Blood dripped from the rear step. More than 50 others were wounded, five critically. It was Israel’s worst suicide bombing in ten weeks, Jerusalem’s worst in six years, and the 69th since the present Palestinian intifada began 21 months ago. Israel decided on “a series of military actions” in retaliation, and Palestinian officials said early today that Israeli tanks and infantry had entered the Jenin refugee camp in the West Bank. The Israeli Army said that an operation was under way in Jenin but did not give details. Public radio reported that the security Cabinet chaired by Ariel Sharon, the Prime Minister, also discussed the possible expulsion of Yassir Arafat’s senior aides, but not the Palestinian leader. The bomber had visited relatives at the weekend, as if to say goodbye. In a farewell note he said he had previously mounted two unsuccessful attacks on Israeli targets but “this time, I hope I will be able to do it . . . how beautiful it is to make my bomb shrapnel kill the enemy”. There was nothing remotely beautiful about the devastation he left behind him. Yishai Ben-Aharon, a 13-year-old Israeli who was walking past the bus on his way to school as it exploded, said: “There was a big noise, the whole bus was burning, a lot of bodies, a lot of people shouting and screaming. It was terrible.” He was being treated in hospital yesterday. Shlomi Kalderon, a 32-year-old Israeli who had just dropped his children off at kindergarten, said: “All the people went flying up into the air. People from the cars behind me came running up to the bus and started pulling people out of the windows. They didn’t save many . . . I saw a head next to me.” Yakir Barashi, 14, who had just stepped off another bus, said: “There was blood everywhere. I’m afraid to go on a bus, to go to school. I saw one kid with nails cutting into his entire body.” A woman at the scene screamed “Where is my sister?” as rescue workers and volunteers placed corpses in black plastic bags and collected remains. Other relatives gathered at a forensic science institute where specialists were trying to identify the dead. Mr Sharon rushed to the scene. “The horrible pictures we saw here today of these murderous acts by the Palestinians are stronger than any words,” he said as he stood near a row of black plastic body bags. The blast came as President Bush was preparing an address in which he was expected to outline a route to a provisional Palestinian state. The White House said that he strongly condemned the bombing. Mr Sharon used the occasion to deliver a clear message to Washington that he remains implacably opposed to Palestinian statehood. “This terrible thing that we see is a continuation of Palestinian terrorism, and against the terrorism we have to fight and struggle,” he said. Israel blamed Mr Arafat’s Palestinian Authority for the attack, despite a statement from the authority condemning the bombing. Shimon Peres, the Israeli Foreign Minister, cut short a visit to Bulgaria. Police, meanwhile, were hunting for a second suspected suicide bomber. “It is likely that there is at least one more homicide attacker on his way to Jerusalem,” Ehud Olmert, the Mayor of Jerusalem, said. This month at least 43 Israelis have been killed by Palestinian extremist groups that appear determined to prove their potency after Israel’s Operation Defensive Shield, the six-week assault against in West Bank in April and May to root out terrorism. Hamas, the Islamic Resistance Movement, claimed to be behind yesterday’s bombing. “We tell all Zionists to prepare their coffins and graves because their dead will be in the hundreds,” it said. Al-Ghoul was a devout, single Muslim and a student of Islamic studies at a university in Nablus. In his farewell note he told his mother: “Don’t be sad, don’t cry, but be proud that I am a martyr.” His father, Haza, said he was “very happy” to hear what his son had done.
It is time to hold the families of the bombers accountable, instead of letting them receive monetary rewards from Saudi Arabia and Saddam Hussein, the Israelis should capture the families of the bombers and put them in jail. Once the bombers see what happens to their families, they will stop these attacks.
Yes, my brother and I came to the conclusion months ago. You'd also have to level everything they own, grab mother, father, sisters, uncles, aunts. Lot more effective than destroying whole cities.
Claim: An Islamic bank is the majority owner of the Caribou Coffee chain.
Status: True.
Example: [Collected on the Internet, 2002]
As you will see from the links below, Caribou Coffee is owned 87.8% by the First Islamic Investment Bank which, among other things has the following philosophy: "Above all, ensuring that all activities conform to Islamic Shari'ah" The chairman of their Shari'ah supervisory board is:
Dr. Yusuf Abdullah Al-Qaradawi
Chairman, Seerah & Sunnah Center, Qatar University; Professor, Faculty of Shari'ah, Qatar University.
As you will see from the links below he is also on the supervisory board of "Union for Good," which is a charitable organization to support Palestinians. Nothing wrong with a charity to help Palestinians, but here is a quote from the Union for Good web site:
You get the picture. Starbucks here I come!!!
http://www.firstislamic.com/sharia.htm
http://www.firstislamic.com/caribou.html
http://www.interpal.org/web/supervisory.htm
http://www.interpal.org/web/cbackground.htm
Unfortunately, the new venture was plagued by problems nearly from the start, and by 1996 Caribou board members were expressing concern about the company's operating problems. In 1997, Jay Willoughby, an operations expert from Pepsico, was brought into the fold; although the chain opened nearly 50 stores that year, its growth was halted at about 90 outlets in 1998 while the company sought to address its operating issues. In 1999 the Pucketts were replaced by McDonald's veteran Don Dempsey as chairman and chief executive, but by the end of 2000 the company ran out of cash and could not raise any more operating capital from its investors (who had already kicked in more than $40 million through several rounds of financing).
So, in December 2000, Caribou Coffee Company, Inc. announced that it was selling a 70% stake (later to become an 87.8%) to Atlanta-based Crescent Capital, a deep-pockets investor backed by First Islamic Investment Bank of Bahrain for $80 million; founders John and Kim Puckett left the board, but CEO Don Dempsey stayed on to run the company for the new owners.
Should any of this be a cause of concern to coffee lovers, especially since Caribou Coffee is second only to Seattle-based Starbucks (albeit a distant second, with a couple of hundred stores to Starbucks' 4,700) as the USA's largest chain of non-franchised specialty coffeehouses?
The impression many people are taking from the message quoted above is: "Oh, no; Caribou is owned by Islamic militants, the same people who are trying to kill us!" That isn't what the message claims, however. The protest is that one of the members of the First Islamic Investment Bank's supervisory board is also on the supervisory board of the Union for Good, a coalition of charities (such as the London-based Interpal) providing various means of relief to Palestinians. The message notes that there is "nothing wrong with a charity to help Palestinians" but then suggests Caribou Coffee should be shunned because of two sentences from the introductory paragraph on the Union for Good's English-language web site:
The continuing aggression from the occupying forces against unarmed Palestinians coupled with the blockade, the destruction of the resources of state, not to mention random attacks on innocent children, the elderly and women as part of a collective punishment campaign has resulted in the deaths of hundreds of civilians and the wounding of thousands more. The Al-Aqsa Intifada is the latest of a long line of affliction faced by the people of Palestine. Its ancestry dates back to the massacre of innocent men, women and children in villages such as Deir Yaseen and the illegal occupation of Palestine in 1948.
Moreover, the blockade has a crippling effect on the labour force resulting in the loss of the livelihood of hundreds of thousands of Palestinian workers. This can only be termed a human catastrophe. Not only that, an economic disaster, a state of famine, the paralysis of all national institutions and public services, the destruction of the education system and a deterioration of the health situation are the natural outcomes.
In the light of what is mentioned above a group of international charities have collaborated in launching a human relief campaign to expand the circle of support to avert the threat and danger posed by the occupying forces. The aim is also to raise public awareness of the real tragedy of the current situation and to endeavour to ease the effects of the unjust and discriminatory sanction imposed on the Palestinian people in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.
This is done in solidarity with our Palestinian brothers and sisters in support of their steadfastness in what is called the I’tilafu al-Khayr Union for Good 101 Days Campaign: in solidarity with the people of Palestine to ease the effects of the blockade imposed by the occupying forces and in support of their steadfastness.
All the participating charitable organisations have agreed to form the Coalition of Charities which will co-operate and co-ordinate to support and fund relief, rehabilitation and development projects implemented by charities in Palestine to ease the effects of the sanction."
Certainly the statements that Al-Aqsa Intifada "is the latest of a long line of affliction faced by the people of Palestine," that Palestinians were "massacred" at Deir Yassin, and that Palestine has been "illegally occupied" since 1948 would be hotly contested by many pro-Israel groups, but it's hardly surprising to find a pro-Palestinian focus on the web site of a Middle Eastern-based Palestinian relief organization. Perhaps some of us believe that all charitable groups should be apolitical (and those that aren't should be avoided), but the reality is that many charitable organizations are decidedly partisan. (We've also discussed on other pages that what a corporate board member does as a private citizen and what he does in his official capacity as an officer of corporation are two very different things, so the political stance of a First Islamic Investment Bank board member is not necessarily reflective of the bank's corporate policies. Given the nature of the Islamic Shari'ah, however, business, politics, and religion are inextricably intertwined.)
So, the bottom line is that those who are concerned that a member of the advisory board of the bank which owns the majority of Caribou Coffee is also a board member of a pro-Palestinian relief coalition may wish to satisfy their gourmet coffee habits somewhere other than at Caribou stores.
Last updated: 10 June 2002
Why should they be sheltered and fed at Israeli expense? Drop them off at His Majesty's palaces in Saudi.
I just saw that on the net somewhere a few days ago - it's Caribou Coffee.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.