Replies

I don't care what you think of my posts. I'm telling you what my opinion is of Bush. If you don't like what I say or how I say it, tough. I responded in a reasonable manner. I had begun to develop a response to you and decided it was a waste of time. You guys don't care about anything other than defending the indefensible. If I would have given you an extensive post you'd have dismissed it as easily as you did the comments I did make. The bottom line is that on this issue, the one of providing 50% taxe breaks to conservancy groups, Bush screwed up. Yep, big-time. Now, if you want to go spam all the threads on the topics you posted in your "wonder of wonders" list, go for it. This thread wasn't about those subjects.

Actually I was interested in your response. The debate between differing viewpoints that exists on FR was one of the main reasons I finally decided to sign up after lurking for a long time. I understand your hesitation with your reply for it's obvious we both are committed to our own opinions and we should agree to disagree on the matter, but I do enjoy the challenge of a good discussion, and I was anticipating an interesting reply from you having noted how long you've been on the forum. And please, no offense was meant. I most certainly approve your right to voice your opinion. And I'm unsure why you would think that I would spam all of the threads. The point I was trying to make to you, and to others on the thread who were calling Bush nothing but a socialist, was that he has accomplished many things that have most conservatives' approval.