Skip to comments.
Don't pay your taxes...coming to a town near you.
The Daily Gazette
| June 18, 2002
| Carl Strock
Posted on 06/18/2002 7:35:22 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-266 next last
1
posted on
06/18/2002 7:35:22 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: 1Old Pro
He better get used to jail.
2
posted on
06/18/2002 7:36:49 AM PDT
by
AppyPappy
To: AppyPappy
That's exactly what I was thinking...
3
posted on
06/18/2002 7:38:34 AM PDT
by
mattdono
To: 1Old Pro
...sounding, I must say, as if he's gone over entirely to the kook wing of American politics. Why is it when a person realizes the injustice of the tax code and wants to do something about it they are usually labled as 'kooks' or a 'nuts'?
I wish this guy all the best, at least he has the stones to stick by his principles.
4
posted on
06/18/2002 7:42:42 AM PDT
by
Pern
To: 1Old Pro
Bob Schulz is a good fellow and a dragon-slayer without peer, but this time I think he's taken on a bigger dragon than he can handle. Governments guard no privilege more jealously than that of milking us dry to pay for their boondoggles and vote-buying campaigns. Anyone who steps forward to lead a tax revolt must know that a crosshairs will settle on his forehead at once.
It's a fine, brave gesture, but it's likely to get him very substandard accommodations at a federal resort. Without room service. Well, room service of the good kind, anyway. Ask Irwin Schiff.
Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com
5
posted on
06/18/2002 7:44:01 AM PDT
by
fporretto
To: 1Old Pro
I wish him luck. Thing is, most folks work for some company who takes out all these taxes before they get what's left so refusing to file isn't an option (unless they don't want to get any 'extra' back, that is). I keep wondering what would happen if a state passed some sort of ordance saying that companies didn't have to 'withhold' from their employees' checks and whether such a move could possibly fall under 10th amendment protection somehow...
Comment #7 Removed by Moderator
To: Pern
Why is it when a person realizes the injustice of the tax code and wants to do something about it they are usually labled as 'kooks' or a 'nuts'? Because the people that call them "kooks" and "nuts" can't stand the fact that they themselves do not have the guts to do what someone like Shulz does.
8
posted on
06/18/2002 7:56:40 AM PDT
by
FreeTally
To: KentuckyWoman
They could do so in regardes to state taxes, not federal.
And NEVER forget, and most people don't know, prior to WWII there was no withholding. It was instituted because the government needed a constant stream of revenue to pay for the war. Withholding was suppose to end when the war ended. As we know, it didnt.
And neither did the tax on your phone instituted to help pay for the Spanish-American war. Were still paying it over 100 years later. I havent heard any reports from the front lately, I sure hope our boys are kicking some Spanish ass and come home soon.
To: adolfus34
actually he is **instigating** the public You misspelled "hoodwinking". Hope this helps.
To: 1Old Pro
Here's a link to a website where you can order a videotape for $20, or read much of the material for free. It will explain in great detail how
A CITIZEN OF ONE OF THE 50 STATES WITH A DOMESTIC INCOME IS NOT REQUIRED TO PAY FEDERAL INCOME TAXES !!!!
Theft by Deception
I defy anyone to watch the tape and disprove anything in it. I have watched it 6 times and researched, independently, the material presented; and I have ordered copies for many friends, some of which are lawyers and accountants. No one has been able to dispute its findings. It is well documented.
Yet we know that the federal government, as a current police state, has the POWER to force us to do almost anything, even if it does not have the Constitutional authority to do so.
To: AppyPappy
The conclusion of that hearing, you will not be surprised to learn, is that the 16th Amendment to the Constitution, establishing the tax, was not properly ratified back in 1913, and the Internal Revenue Service, therefore, has no good foundation in law. The government has been conning us all these years.
If this is so, then the public needs to know and Congress needs to understand that we are sick of being held down by excessive taxation, and that the law which upholds the power of the IRS to remove our money from us is now suspect.
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: BillofRights
14
posted on
06/18/2002 8:08:32 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: Pern
I believe the author was specifically referring to the Federal Reserve rant when pondering his kookiness. I have to agree. It's one thing to disapprove of how things are done. It's another to suppose that it's a result of a conspiracy. Unless you are talking about the NY Yankees, of course.
15
posted on
06/18/2002 8:09:08 AM PDT
by
Mr. Bird
To: KentuckyWoman
BINGO! You hit the nail on the head. None of us pay taxes. We pay our mortgage, and credit card bills, but our taxes are confiscated by our employers before we ever see our checks. Thomas Jefferson said it best, "this country will need a revolution every twenty years, just to keep our government right. But, somewhere in the last half of the last century Americans became a bunch of squirrels. I will tell you who the tax code does not apply toward ... every single person who comes to this country get a free ride on the income tax issue for SEVEN full years.
To: AppyPappy
He better get used to jail.Jail means he is going to get free lodging and free food. This is socialism.
Bob Shulz is advocating socialism.
heheheheh
To: Phantom Lord
18
posted on
06/18/2002 8:11:39 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: 1Old Pro
Maybe Bob and
Steve should have a pow-wow. Poor 'ole Steve took his cause all the way to the SCOTUS and lost.
Unfortunately, I think this is pretty simple: Even if the Federal Income Tax is illegal, was never ratified properly, is voluntary, or whatever, the cards are stacked against all who try and fight it.
Personally, I think anyone who fights it is spinning their wheels and asking for jail time. Better to spend all that energy trying to change the existing system. Check here.
19
posted on
06/18/2002 8:12:28 AM PDT
by
upchuck
To: BillofRights
Yet we know that the federal government, as a current police state, has the POWER to force us to do almost anything, even if it does not have the Constitutional authority to do so. And that's precisely why our founders didn't believe a standing army was a proper function of the federal government. We are being forced to pay for our own incarceration and there's nothing we can do about it because not enough people will stand up together and say NO for fear of being shot as a 'threat'. We have seen what happens to those who get on the wrong side of the government ala' Waco, Ruby Ridge and others. Seeing US Citizens burned alive is an excellent deterrent for future disenters.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-266 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson