[Lorianne]

Not at all. If we follow your "we know what you're thinking" logic there would be no place for social criticism of any kind whatsoever because it might lead to legislation.

Apparently lost on yours is the irony that this is the same type of projection of motive you are accusing the author of having.

[HassanBenSobar]

You may have misconstrued my point. I conceded: suppose the article is 100% correct. Then what? I don't mind the social criticism. Lots of things in society deserve criticism. So, fine. Maybe it IS correct. Is it not reasonable to ask, 'so what'? The ARTICLE (not necessarily the poster), from the tone itself, screams out that something should be done. Ok. Obviously I disagree. If I had to insist on one point, it's that porn is utterly trivial compared to other social ills. Just my point of view.