[jlogajan]

Such a transfer previously had been recognized as having a minor role in evolution

Then in fact it is nothing new. Shhh. Don't tell the creationists -- they'll be all disappointed that science already knew about this.

[That Subliminal Kid]

Hey logjam, why do you keep ducking my pointed request that you define for us once and for all what a "Creationist" is?

[berned]

Then in fact it is nothing new. Shhh. Don't tell the creationists -- they'll be all disappointed that science already knew about this.

Ok. For the sake of argument, let's say this new wrinkle is true, and the previous theories are wrong. What then do the Darwinists say to all the public school children who have been lied to for the last 40 years?

The next time the "scientists" proclaim something as the undebatable truth, will we be able to throw the original, now discredited Darwin theories in their faces, or, as usual, are we suppose to conventiently forget how often scientists are wrong, and arrogantly wrong at that?