[berned]

Then in fact it is nothing new. Shhh. Don't tell the creationists -- they'll be all disappointed that science already knew about this.

Ok. For the sake of argument, let's say this new wrinkle is true, and the previous theories are wrong. What then do the Darwinists say to all the public school children who have been lied to for the last 40 years?

The next time the "scientists" proclaim something as the undebatable truth, will we be able to throw the original, now discredited Darwin theories in their faces, or, as usual, are we suppose to conventiently forget how often scientists are wrong, and arrogantly wrong at that?

[donh]

The next time the "scientists" proclaim something as the undebatable truth,

Could you give us a pointer to an example of this? What does it say on the marqee?

The Theory of Gravity
The Theory of Continental Drift
The Theory of Evolution

Can you not even read the titles of the books for understanding? What's the point of criticizing something you don't even grasp the first principals of?

[jlogajan]

The next time the "scientists" proclaim something as the undebatable truth

Actually, I'd like an example of the "first time" science has proclaimed anything "undebatable" or "truth."

It's not that evolution is undebatable, it is that Creationism and its latest flavor, ID, is not even serious fiction. Work on your own case -- you seem to interesting in proving a negative. Prove creationism.

[jlogajan]

What then do the Darwinists say to all the public school children who have been lied to for the last 40 years?

Heck, what about all the Christians who've been lied to for 2000 years. Science can be wrong for decades, the Bible is wrong forever.