Skip to comments.
Gore Won Florida! (Democrats still Shouting this Absurdity!)
Democrats.com: The aggressive progressives ^
| As on their Web Site: 17 JUN 02
| Editorial Staff
Posted on 06/16/2002 9:52:47 AM PDT by vannrox
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
To: Lazamataz
I just love how this sticks in their craw. The angrier they get, the happier I feel. Do you think that, if we poked them with a stick, they'd pitch a big riot? Flaming buildings and pullulating mobs of looters and vandals? Like, the weekend before the next presidential election?
To: vannrox
"...and the Republican-owned media did everything in their power to prevent a fair and legal count of the votes." WOW! I've obvoiusly been living in the wrong dimension.
22
posted on
06/16/2002 10:44:10 AM PDT
by
callisto
To: vannrox
Nope, they haven't given up yet ....
23
posted on
06/16/2002 10:55:28 AM PDT
by
mikrofon
To: Let's Roll
Bush won the national popular vote when you throw out the inner city precincts that went more than 90% for Gore - always a sign of fraud according to election experts - or those that had 110% turnout or stayed open 3 hours past the official closing time etc. These things happened in the rest of the countryI recall reading that many of the inner city precincts in Philadelphia went 99% for Gore with 105% voter turnout. Bush lost Pennsylvania due to vote fraud. I've never understood why there's been no push to investigate this and other examples of voting irregularities.
24
posted on
06/16/2002 10:56:05 AM PDT
by
WarrenC
To: deport
I honestly believe the South won the Civil War. (See how silly that sounds?)
25
posted on
06/16/2002 10:59:48 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: vannrox
Hey,When Are The DemocRats Gonna Get It?ALGORE Didn't Need To Win Florida,He Needed To Win His"Home?"State,Tennessee!!!
To: vannrox
Aside from the fact that some of them are probably certifiable the two things that really get me are the "overvotes" and the "riot".
"Overvote" is just a euphemism for invalid ballot. They are typically trying to hijack the language once again. How can they be certain that the "extra" vote on the ballot was the mistake and not the one for Gore. There can be absolutely no degree of certaints as to which was the intended vote. Again, they show the liberal penchant for "really knowing" what everyone else needs or wants.
The allegation of the riot is laughable. These were simply legally-entitled observers who were illegally being kept from observing when the majority Democrats on the board of elections tried to count in secret, thus making it easier for the Democrats to steal the election. To say this was a riot is delusional at best and a lie at worst.
27
posted on
06/16/2002 11:12:27 AM PDT
by
CaptRon
To: lavaroise
yet we let them get away with it Don't mean to be picky, but what is we? You appear to be a German philosopher/pilot. ;)
To: vannrox
They forgot #11 - Every Vote Counts....unless its a Military Vote!
29
posted on
06/16/2002 11:42:39 AM PDT
by
Bommer
To: deport
I love that picture of the President taking his oath. I remember how gray and dreary it was that day with even a little drizzle.
But ... when the President stepped up to take his oath ... a hole opened in the clouds and a stream of sunlight shone down right on the President - this picture is a perfect example.
There was NO sunlight anywhere else. It was another "God Votes" sign to me.
30
posted on
06/16/2002 11:50:45 AM PDT
by
CyberAnt
To: parsifal
And ... while they are saying it was the republicans who were manipulating the votes - they fail to mention IT WAS DEMOCRATS WHO RAN THE PRECINCTS!!!
31
posted on
06/16/2002 11:53:40 AM PDT
by
CyberAnt
To: CaptRon
"Overvote" is just a euphemism for invalid ballot. They are typically trying to hijack the language once again. How can they be certain that the "extra" vote on the ballot was the mistake and not the one for Gore. Simple. If a voter voted for Gore and a third party candidate, then clearly they intended to vote only for Gore. If a voter voted for Bush and a third party candidate, then clearly they really intended to vote for Gore. Also, if a voter died before the election, then clearly they intended to vote for Gore, so the dead voter ballots should count too.
However, if a voter was serving in the military and tried to vote for Bush, then clearly the voter didn't care enough about the election to go AWOL and vote in person, so their votes should not count.
Now, that wasn't so difficult to understand, was it?
Of course, what "Whining DemocRATs" thread would be complete without the Official Seal of the Democrat Party?
To: Howlin
I honestly believe the South won the Civil War. (See how silly that sounds?)Have you ever checked out one of those anti-Lincoln threads? You'd be a hero there! It's a whole FR subculture.
To: vannrox
I think the Democrats should simply nominate Gore in 2004. They can prove Gore's popularity once and for all as he is swept into office, settling the score.
To: vannrox
Absentee ballots cast in Seminole and Martin counties by Republican voters following the criminal alteration of defective ballot applications by Republican operatives: 5,000 (99% Bush) Two Democrat Judges found that there was no alteration of anything that illegally effected the vote.
But these SoreLosermans still keep parroting the same old lies.
What a pathetic bunch they are.
36
posted on
06/16/2002 12:19:04 PM PDT
by
Jorge
To: AmishDude
I peaked once. It was enough. I get enough "spin" from the media, thank you very much! :-)
37
posted on
06/16/2002 12:19:23 PM PDT
by
Howlin
Comment #38 Removed by Moderator
To: Bubba_Leroy
Oh. I guess I just misunderstood the rules.
39
posted on
06/16/2002 12:23:52 PM PDT
by
CaptRon
To: vannrox
I can't believe they're still whining about their failure to steal the election. Oh, wait....they're liberals. Whining is all they ever do.
40
posted on
06/16/2002 12:25:47 PM PDT
by
Allegra
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-87 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson