Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Good-Bye Cruel Free Republic
6-16-02 | wasfree

Posted on 06/16/2002 5:32:24 AM PDT by magnum opus dejure

Well, it's been 4 years since I first found Free Republic. I have always felt like I belonged here and have really enjoyed the banter back and forth between us members. I am afraid all this is now over. I am really suprised and shocked at it's suddenness. Before I leave I want to thank a freeper from Michigan who sent me a DVD player last year to give to my kids for Christmas. You reaffirmed my faith in humanity.

I know this thread will be deleted before many people get to read it, but I just can't go without saying a final word. Every since 911 the 'vibe' here at FR has been decidedly hostile. I guess it was a matter of time before the newbie moderator got around to weeding me out for my sometimes unpopular views. So I join the ranks of A+Bert and so many others who gave FR a interesting flavor. I will miss coming here 20 times a day and keeping up on things. But without posting priviledges there is just no point. I must go find another conservative group to try to be a part of.

In the future, when a freeper who has been a loyal member since August 1998 crosses the line, how about a note instead of banning? Would that have been too much? I may have gotten out of line, how is beyond me, but if such a tresspass would have been pointed out I would gladly have refrained from doing so again. It is just not right to just ban an account with no explaination. Especially when the freeper has been here 4 years. I have no idea what I am going to do with my days now that I no longer have FR. Well, I guess I have said my part. It is a sad day when one has to leave family and friends. I feel like some of you were just that. But apparently I am no longer wanted around here. I bid my good day to you all and hope that karma pays it's respects to those who do injustice.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: opuslist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940941-960961-980 ... 1,401-1,420 next last
To: habs4ever
Has Padilla received the due process he is entitled to as a enemy combatant?

More than he's entitled to from the looks of it.

941 posted on 06/16/2002 9:31:24 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 929 | View Replies]

To: another cricket
OK. I just got thru reading a book about the Flying Tigers. But OTOH, wouldn't it be kinda kool if some of our less desirable citizens left here and went and joined the Al Qaida. We might get the whole Berkeley and Harvard faculty with one B-52 flying over Khost, Afghanistan. Oh, that's probably just a fantasy. parsy.
942 posted on 06/16/2002 9:31:28 PM PDT by parsifal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 933 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Well, what a snappy comeback. You got me!
943 posted on 06/16/2002 9:31:31 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 938 | View Replies]

To: Howlin

Well, yeah.. But if it pisses Quannell "X" and his little band of black pajamma'd schmucks off it's worth it.

944 posted on 06/16/2002 9:31:31 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 935 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
By the way -- Unless I am mistaken, Congressman Ron Paul did NOT authorize any "war". Rather, Congressman Ron Paul said that the only way to avoid a horrific Constitutional FUBAR was to formally declare War... otherwise, we have our Nationalist Heads up our Constitutional Arse.

On Bush's Illegal Undeclared War: Congressman Ron Paul, 10-29-2001

<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

The Honorable Congressman is absolutely correct! He's the only man in congress with the integrety to be there.

945 posted on 06/16/2002 9:31:58 PM PDT by sandmanbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 925 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz, Jim Robinson, Demidog, carenot
By the way -- Unless I am mistaken, Congressman Ron Paul did NOT authorize any "war". Rather, Congressman Ron Paul said that the only way to avoid a horrific Constitutional FUBAR was to formally declare War... otherwise, we have our Nationalist Heads up our Constitutional Arse.

Incidentally, I am NOT some anti-american Communist who traitorously disapproves of War against those who kill Americans.

I am in favor of War against those who kill Americans.

In fact, I agree with Ron Paul -- formal War is the ONLY Right and Constitutional way to do a Federal Military war-Operation. (anything short of War is grounds for Marque and Reprisal).


946 posted on 06/16/2002 9:32:16 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 784 | View Replies]

To: sandmanbr
Jose Padilla has already been convicted of killing a man.
Then he never should have been let out.

He was a minor at the time. American justice was sensitive to his rights. This is the thanks we get. CONTEMPT. Your softheaded stance is laughable to him. He would sneer and call you a mere woman.

947 posted on 06/16/2002 9:32:22 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 813 | View Replies]

To: Jhoffa_
But what if they...............er........uh...never mind. I can SEE them in this! I can!
948 posted on 06/16/2002 9:33:24 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 944 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
That, Ace, is for a Military Tribunal to assess

Wow kids, did you see this? I got called Ace!

HeeHeee!

949 posted on 06/16/2002 9:33:43 PM PDT by carenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 820 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
formal War

Against what country?

950 posted on 06/16/2002 9:34:09 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 946 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
A link to a website that has a big banner that reads "SECRETS OF THE BUSH CRIME FAMILY"???

Ron Paul did vote to authorize the use of military force WITHOUT a declaration of war

951 posted on 06/16/2002 9:34:25 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 925 | View Replies]

To: Spyder
An earlier post of mine was met with a comment by sneakypete that if I didn't believe in legislating morality I didn't belong in the Republican party.

That is true. The Republican Party is SUPPOSED to stand for individual freedoms. You ain't free when other people have the right to force THEIR morality on you using the force of law.

If the party becomes the right-wing-fundamentalist-Christian-Republicans-only-allowed, you can guarantee that more Clintons, Dasholes, and worse will maintain or regain power.

Please make up your mind which side of this arguement you are on. I DO thank you for making my point,though.

952 posted on 06/16/2002 9:34:45 PM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 810 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
So the thousands of innocent American civilians he slaughtered in the sneak attack don't matter?

No, they don't matter to sneakypete. They're dead, and they didn't die at the hands of the federal government. Why should they matter?

They were mere grist for Osama bin Laden's "more successful" attack. Bill Maher tought the terrorists demonstrated bravery, a quality to be applauded; apparently sneakypete agrees.

When Osama and his ghouls set off a 10 kilton bomb in San Francisco, sneakypete will yawn . . . . until Ashcroft catches one of the conspirators and threatens to put him on trial. Then--WHOA BABY!--sneakypete will be on the job 24/7 like stupid on a liberal, criticizing and castigating Ashcroft for all manner of imagined denials of due process.

953 posted on 06/16/2002 9:36:59 PM PDT by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 931 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
Oh goodness, every gov't forces morality on its citizens. It has to or we wouldn't have a society. Even a libertarian society would have to force morality on its citizens. parsy.
954 posted on 06/16/2002 9:37:10 PM PDT by parsifal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 952 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry;rjaynej;johnhuang2
You know, that last sentence should be it's own thread!!!

Quote of the day!

955 posted on 06/16/2002 9:37:11 PM PDT by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 936 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288, carenot, Demidog
Ron Paul did vote to authorize the use of military force WITHOUT a declaration of war

In a specific context, yes.

It was NOT a blank check, so let's not pretend it was.
The nice thing about Ron Paul is, alone among Congressmen, he NEVER signs a blank check.

Ever.

956 posted on 06/16/2002 9:38:30 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 951 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican;Fred Mertz
BTW, who cares what you think

I do. As do most of the real Americans out there.

957 posted on 06/16/2002 9:38:55 PM PDT by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 898 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I don't care if Quannell isn't involved..

I just like mocking him for the fun of it!

Regards.. Jhoffa_"X"

(ohh! ohh! I am a toughie.. I got an "X" behind my name! see! see!)

958 posted on 06/16/2002 9:39:42 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 948 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
And you would be who?

Someone who saw you be a sactimonious suckup.

And you would be who?

959 posted on 06/16/2002 9:40:08 PM PDT by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 939 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
By the way -- Unless I am mistaken, Congressman Ron Paul did NOT authorize any "war". Rather, Congressman Ron Paul said that the only way to avoid a horrific Constitutional FUBAR was to formally declare War...

"President Bush now has the challenge to do something equally courageous and wise. This is necessary if we expect to avert a catastrophic World War III. When the President asks for patience as he and his advisors deliberate, seeking a course of action, all Americans should surely heed his request. Mr. Speaker, I support President Bush and voted for the authority and the money to carry out his responsibility to defend this country ..." --Ron Paul

960 posted on 06/16/2002 9:40:13 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 925 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 921-940941-960961-980 ... 1,401-1,420 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson