Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Good-Bye Cruel Free Republic
6-16-02 | wasfree

Posted on 06/16/2002 5:32:24 AM PDT by magnum opus dejure

Well, it's been 4 years since I first found Free Republic. I have always felt like I belonged here and have really enjoyed the banter back and forth between us members. I am afraid all this is now over. I am really suprised and shocked at it's suddenness. Before I leave I want to thank a freeper from Michigan who sent me a DVD player last year to give to my kids for Christmas. You reaffirmed my faith in humanity.

I know this thread will be deleted before many people get to read it, but I just can't go without saying a final word. Every since 911 the 'vibe' here at FR has been decidedly hostile. I guess it was a matter of time before the newbie moderator got around to weeding me out for my sometimes unpopular views. So I join the ranks of A+Bert and so many others who gave FR a interesting flavor. I will miss coming here 20 times a day and keeping up on things. But without posting priviledges there is just no point. I must go find another conservative group to try to be a part of.

In the future, when a freeper who has been a loyal member since August 1998 crosses the line, how about a note instead of banning? Would that have been too much? I may have gotten out of line, how is beyond me, but if such a tresspass would have been pointed out I would gladly have refrained from doing so again. It is just not right to just ban an account with no explaination. Especially when the freeper has been here 4 years. I have no idea what I am going to do with my days now that I no longer have FR. Well, I guess I have said my part. It is a sad day when one has to leave family and friends. I feel like some of you were just that. But apparently I am no longer wanted around here. I bid my good day to you all and hope that karma pays it's respects to those who do injustice.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: opuslist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,041-1,0601,061-1,0801,081-1,100 ... 1,401-1,420 next last
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
In the case of Enemy Combatants: we shoot first, and ask questions later

What a simple world. Or we capture and question them.

1,061 posted on 06/16/2002 10:26:12 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1050 | View Replies]

To: A Citizen Reporter
Sleep deprivation was a favorite tool of the Gestapo and KGB. parsy.
1,062 posted on 06/16/2002 10:27:01 PM PDT by parsifal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1060 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
I guess I will have to lead you to water

An early controversy revolved about the issue of the President's powers and the necessity of congressional action when hostilities are initiated against us rather than the Nation instituting armed conflict. The Bey of Tripoli, in the course of attempting to extort payment for not molesting United States shipping, declared war upon the United States, and a debate began whether Congress had to enact a formal declaration of war to create a legal status of war. President Jefferson sent a squadron of frigates to the Mediterranean to protect our ships but limited its mission to defense in the narrowest sense of the term. Attacked by a Tripolitan cruiser, one of the frigates subdued it, disarmed it, and, pursuant to instructions, released it. Jefferson in a message to Congress announced his actions as in compliance with constitutional limitations on his authority in the absence of a declaration of war.1422 Hamilton espoused a different interpretation, contending that the Constitution vested in Congress the power to initiate war but that when another nation made war upon the United States we were already in a state of war and no declaration by Congress was needed.1423 Congress thereafter enacted a statute authorizing the President to instruct the commanders of armed vessels of the United States to seize all vessels and goods of the Bey of Tripoli ''and also to cause to be done all such other acts of precaution or hostility as the state of war will justify . . .''1424 But no formal declaration of war was passed, Congress apparently accepting Hamilton's view.1425

1,063 posted on 06/16/2002 10:27:13 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1058 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
Affirmation of War.

Congress has authorized our President to act. Squirmy.

1,064 posted on 06/16/2002 10:27:27 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1058 | View Replies]

To: habs4ever
means being a moral equivocator, doesn't it?

In what way am I a moral equivocator?

1,065 posted on 06/16/2002 10:27:45 PM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 910 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
You know what they say about not being able to force them to drink.
1,066 posted on 06/16/2002 10:28:13 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1063 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
The nice thing about Ron Paul is, alone among Congressmen, he NEVER signs a blank check.

Ever.

Unless you are a quarterly estimated income tax payer; Rep. Paul has no problem declaring war on them.

H. R. 4855

Proposed legislation:

SEC. 4. MONTHLY PAYMENTS OF ESTIMATED TAXES.

(a) IN GENERAL- Subsection (c) of section 6654 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (relating to estimated income tax for individuals) is amended to read as follows:

`(c) NUMBER OF REQUIRED INSTALLMENTS; DUE DATES- For purposes of this section--

`(1) PAYABLE MONTHLY- There shall be 12 required installments for each taxable year, one for each calendar month.

`(2) TIME FOR PAYMENT OF INSTALLMENTS- The due date for each required installment shall be the 15th day of the following month.'

1,067 posted on 06/16/2002 10:28:47 PM PDT by Too_Bad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 956 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
Bush has a Constitutional, and broad, authority.

To punish particular Murderers, yes.

the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001

That's actually pretty definite and specific.

9-11-01. Go after 'em.

I'm for it. And that is all that is authorized.

1,068 posted on 06/16/2002 10:29:22 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1056 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Is it okay with you if we incorporate that into your opus, which will, of course, be written by a "new screenname" or a friend of yours after you pass from this place?

Sure,but I don't think his skin is that thin. But if I'm wrong,have at it!

1,069 posted on 06/16/2002 10:29:44 PM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 914 | View Replies]

To: parsifal
Have you seen pictures of him? He looks half way there already. But he can sleep, trust me, you can learn to sleep through anything. But they do have to be able to see him at all times. Not just for his sake but for ours. Can you imagine the screams from France if he died in US custody?

a.cricket

1,070 posted on 06/16/2002 10:30:03 PM PDT by another cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1059 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
"(those old Founders just get proven Right over and over and over)"

Yes, Adams and Jefferson had good reasons for NOT getting a general declaration of war ( especially Adams).

I'm glad you approve!

Of course there are also good reasons for a DOW, depending on the circumstances.

1,071 posted on 06/16/2002 10:30:14 PM PDT by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1050 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Congress has authorized our President to act. Squirmy.

"War" cleans up a lot of Constitutional gray areas between "citizens" and "combatatants".

Fact.

1,072 posted on 06/16/2002 10:30:53 PM PDT by OrthodoxPresbyterian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1064 | View Replies]

To: parsifal
Why is everybody so mad at each other on this thread?

Because damn near everybody is operating on emotion,not logic.

1,073 posted on 06/16/2002 10:31:11 PM PDT by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 913 | View Replies]

To: mrsmith
Congressional act in support of President Adams' undeclared war:
Congressional act in support of President Jefferson's undeclared war:
Congressional act in support of President Bush's undeclared war:

One, two, three strikes. Right across the plate.

1,074 posted on 06/16/2002 10:31:14 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1056 | View Replies]

To: another cricket
Let France scream. Cheese eating surrender monkeys. Uh Oh --Its 12:31 here. Gots to go to bed. Night all. Shantih. Shantih. Shantih. parsy.
1,075 posted on 06/16/2002 10:32:13 PM PDT by parsifal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1070 | View Replies]

To: parsifal
Parsy, you are so sweet, you ought to have played Father Flannigan.Maybe you want to try your luck being a Warden instead?
1,076 posted on 06/16/2002 10:32:45 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1059 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
You haven't seemed to need my permission to post misinformation before...

Post it, Howlin.

1,077 posted on 06/16/2002 10:32:47 PM PDT by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1007 | View Replies]

To: zip
zip you are a real freeper!

Why are all of you folks posting when no one is here?

over a 1000 post weird!

I a sure this weirdo is back on Free Republic under another name until he gets out of line again!

1,078 posted on 06/16/2002 10:32:52 PM PDT by restornu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1051 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
"War" cleans [SIC] up a lot of Constitutional gray areas between "citizens" and "combatatants". [SIC]

That post didn't "clear up" anything at all.

1,079 posted on 06/16/2002 10:34:15 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1072 | View Replies]

To: sneakypete
Because damn near everybody is operating on emotion,not logic.

I love "logic" when are you going to post some?

1,080 posted on 06/16/2002 10:34:41 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1073 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,041-1,0601,061-1,0801,081-1,100 ... 1,401-1,420 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson