[billybudd]

No, I have no problem with people bearing arms, even in public. But the idea that a band of armed citizens will stop something like 9/11 you have to admit, is silly. Sure, they may prevent some muggings, etc., things that happen on the street. But if we're talking about "real" terrorism, their gang is simply an irrelevant response.

[lavaroise]

Jews have been assassinated in the neighborhood before, Alqaeda has been dispersing and decentralizing their attacks, and they have targeted these kinds of neighborhood, and lots of churches and synagogues are about to burn in America as happening in Europe (what am I saying, they burn the Synagogues in Europes because they give them the churches over there to turn into Mosques).

[Alouette]

But the idea that a band of armed citizens will stop something like 9/11 you have to admit, is silly.

[Twodees]

So, you think that "real terrorism" is carried out by something other than a gang? What do you think these jihadis are, an army? They're a gang of semi-literate fanatics who can be killed as easily as they can kill others. What is your plan, since government did diddly dick to stop the attacks on September 11th, 2001?

This approach hasn't yet been proven worthless, unlike the approach of governments.