Posted on 06/14/2002 7:32:58 AM PDT by aculeus
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Professor Part of International Research Group Refuting Popular Theory
In 1996, marine geologists William Ryan and Walter Pitman published a scientifically popular hypothesis, titled Noah's Flood Hypothesis. The researchers presented evidence of a bursting flood about 7,500 years ago in what is now the Black Sea. This, some say, supports the biblical story of Noah and the flood.
But, such a forceful flood could not have taken place, says Jun Abrajano, professor of earth and environmental sciences at Rensselaer. He is part of an international team of scientists who refute the so-called Noah's Flood Hypothesis.
Abrajano cites evidence of a much more gradual rising of the Black Sea that began to occur 10,000 years ago and continued for 2,000 years.
According to the Noah's Flood Hypothesis, the Black Sea was a freshwater lake separated from the Mediterranean Sea by a narrow strip of land now broken by the Bosporus Strait. Ryan and Pittman argue that the Mediterranean broke through the land and inundated the Black Sea with more than 200 times the force of Niagara Falls. The salty powerful flood swiftly killed the freshwater mollusks in the Black Sea. This, they say, accounts for fossil remains that can be dated back 7,500 years.
Abrajano's team has challenged the theory by studying sediments from the Marmara Sea, which sits next to the Black Sea and opens into the Mediterranean.
The team found a rich mud, called sapropel in the Marmara. The mud provides evidence that there has been sustained interaction between the Mediterranean and the Black Sea for at least 10,000 years.
"For the Noah's Ark Hypothesis to be correct, one has to speculate that there was no flowing of water between the Black Sea and the Marmara Sea before the speculated great deluge," says Abrajano. "We have found this to be incorrect."
GSA (Geological Society of America) Today magazine recently published a paper in its May 2002 edition based on Abrajano's research. His research also will be published this year in Marine Geology, an international science journal.
For a map of the area go to http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/maps/tu-map.jpg
If we were to claim to know God's mind merely from our own speculation, I would agree. But I believe God has revealed his mind (in a limited sense) to man through the prophets, through His Word, and finally in the person of his only Son who was His Son from birth, Jesus Christ, who dies, was buried, and was resurrected from the dead.
I am not being contentious with you, I am just sharing what I believe the teachings of God's Word are, as I understand them.
Such speculation got me thinking about Noah's flood, and the possibility that a massive asteroid impact put the vapor in the air, the shock wave broke up "the fountains of the deep", and the earth was knocked off its axis, and "seedtime and harvest, and cold and heat, and summer and winter" -- the seasons -- began.
Amen
Not embarrassing at all. You assume the earth had the same characteristics before the flood as after. This is clearly could not be the case if one takes the Genesis account at face value, as Jesus Himself did.
However, God is God, and if He wanted vegetation to live underwater for a year, He could make it happen.
Thanks for the correction.
Right...let's say, for the sake of conversation, that the ark did contain only land-based species.
How would Noah & his helpers keep the animals from fighting & killing each other? It seems like quite a lot to ask an ark full of rhinos, gorillas, ostriches, gila monsters, ocelots, & three-toed sloths to play nicely.
And what about the animals that must have been unknown to that region of the world? And how many tons of food would the ark have to hold, not to mention the diversity of each species' diets? How would they have gotten rid of what must have been tons & tons of waste a day?
Science is unnecessary when common sense will do.
Was God just using a literary device?
The Bible was written down by middle-Eastern types. Even here in USA, not every statement is meant to be taken absolutely literally. In the cultures of the middle east, it's more so. For example, one ME ruler might say to another, "If you do such-and-such, I'm going to raise up an army of a million men and come and kick your backside" -- when *both* already know that there's no way on earth the speaker could come up with a million men.
500,000 man army = p*$$ed.
Million man army = REALLY p*$$ed.
Compare:
USA: "Million Man March."
John 21: "And there are also many other things which Jesus did, which if they were written in detail, I suppose that even the world itself would not contain the books which were written."
I, too remember this fact. There are many, many times that the number 40 is used, and this merely meant "many." And, no I can't quote where I've seen it; it is so prevalent that I can't even think of all the places I've read it.
I guess MY "faith" just doesn't allow me to discard scientific facts and stick simply to a document written by humans many years ago. Science is NOT a threat to religion. Those who see it as a threat are missing out on a lot of valuable information. I believe and follow what the Bible instructs as to "does and don'ts" but some of the historical timelines are awfully weak and easily proven to be skewed. JMHO, of course.
Flame away.....I gotta go anyway.
So, abortion is okay? It circumvents
the chance of sinning and going to hell.
But, please see my post #47 to Old Dominion.
I am assuming you trust the words of Jesus when He stated, (Luke 17:26-27) "Just as it was in the days of Noah, so also will it be in the days of the Son of Man. 27 People were eating, drinking, marrying and being given in marriage up to the day Noah entered the ark. Then the flood came and destroyed them all." (NIV)
Surely you must see that a local flood could not "kill them all" if it was local in nature? Right? Certainly a local flood could not cover the highest mountains. Correct?
Couldn't DNA testing of animals prove/disprove the theory that, say, all elephants are descended from a single pair just a few thousand years ago?
Am I wrong?
Come on - you know that's not what I'm saying. Man is specifically forbidden to take innocent lives. You are, however, correct, in that I believe those aborted children are in Heaven ahead of us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.