Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Pushes Gore Plan For Orwellian Government
NewsWithViews.com ^ | Chuck Baldwin

Posted on 06/12/2002 11:34:46 AM PDT by Sir Gawain

BUSH PUSHES GORE PLAN FOR ORWELLIAN GOVERNMENT

 
By Chuck Baldwin
June 11, 2002
NewsWithViews.com

Those who voted for G. W. Bush thinking they were getting a significantly different type of government from the Clinton-Gore years need to think again. Bush's proposal to consolidate federal law enforcement and civil defense capabilities is actually a replay of an old plan first submitted by Al Gore.

A June 10 CNS news report stated, "Some members of Congress, Democrats and Republicans alike, were surprised by President Bush's proposed consolidation of federal law enforcement and civil defense capabilities under a new cabinet level Department of Homeland Security.

"But some are even more surprised to learn the plan has much in common with a nine-year-old idea hatched in the Clinton-Gore administration, which proposed a significant expansion of domestic police powers."

The report further stated, "Numerous components of President Bush's proposal, which were sketched out in a televised address last Thursday, are strikingly similar to a plan proposed by former Vice President Al Gore as part of the Clinton-Gore 'Partnership for Reinventing Government' in 1993."

The Bush-Gore plan to "reinvent government" is, in fact, nothing new. It is as old as tyranny itself - and that is exactly what the Bush-Gore plan is: a modern attempt to reinstall tyrannical government.

In the British newspaper, The Register, Thomas Greene states, "The real purpose (of Bush's proposal), clearly, is data acquisition, mining and manipulation on a gargantuan scale." He is right. Bush's reintroduction of the Clinton-Gore plan has shades of Hitler's SS corps. It is the beginning of a national police force in the United States.

Of course, when Al Gore submitted this plan back in 1993, vociferous opposition from the entire conservative community resisted it. As a result, the plan was summarily defeated.

However, things are different now. A Republican occupies the White House. Furthermore, the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington have created a "security-at-all-costs" mentality among the American people. Because of this, Bush will succeed in implementing the Clinton-Gore plan of freedom confiscation with little or no opposition.

What really takes the cake is the manner in which President Bush continues to coddle illegal aliens. He refuses to deport those whom U.S. law requires to be deported, he continues to promote the concept of granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens, he refuses to take serious measures to keep likely terrorists out of our country, yet, he seems determined to thoroughly dismantle constitutional protection of our liberties.

What conservatives would have never surrendered to Al Gore, they seem happy to acquiesce to George Bush. However, the Clinton- Gore plan to eviscerate America's liberties smells as rotten (even worse) when George Bush regurgitates it! So, what has happened to conservatives' smellers?

 



TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 721 next last
To: Texasforever
Naw...this guy can only aspire to be that stupid.
81 posted on 06/13/2002 8:55:02 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

Comment #82 Removed by Moderator

To: thepitts
"I pray that you are wrong and I fear that you are not."

I really would like to be wrong, but when people view the Constitution as a bunch of nonsense, on one hand, while singing the praises of what is being done, and not done, in the name of safety and security these days, leaves me with a bleaker than normal vision of the future.

Prayer, considering who the enemy really is, remains the most effective weapon.

83 posted on 06/13/2002 8:58:14 PM PDT by Washington_minuteman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
See! Can't you see it? Right there! Da monkey in da twees!
84 posted on 06/13/2002 8:59:03 PM PDT by jwh_Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Washington_minuteman
really would like to be wrong, but when people view the Constitution as a bunch of nonsense, on one hand, while singing the praises of what is being done, and not done, in the name of safety and security these days, leaves me with a bleaker than normal vision of the future.

Give one concrete example of constitutional damage this new cabinet poses.

85 posted on 06/13/2002 9:00:17 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: daiuy
Naw, you can't post anything but the meaningless rhetoric that's been pounded into your brain by those using you to further their agenda.

You cannot provide with a single act by an illegal alien that has compromised national security.

Before you answer, name me a time in the history of the nation when people did not routinely cross the border illegaly.

86 posted on 06/13/2002 9:00:34 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

Comment #87 Removed by Moderator

To: Luis Gonzalez
I will say it again, if the government was serious about terriorists, it would:
Close the borders
Cut back on immigration
Round up and deport all illegals and undesireables
Develope a civilian defense program similar to what we had during WWII

This government hasn't done any of these things, it has only worked to impose restriction on the rights of the citizens of this country. If you have any evidence to the contrary, please let us all know about it. I didn't think so.

88 posted on 06/13/2002 9:02:55 PM PDT by gunshy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
What I don't understand is the reaction from many in here. They are the very same people who are bitching up a storm about the fact that our government has not militarized (or mined) the borders

To his credit, Dubya has not included the BATF in this consolidation of "Homeland Defense" agencies and departments. That overzealous band of jack-booted tax-collectors needs the wind taken out of their sails.

I remain skeptical of Dubya's intent to defend our borders against illegal entrants, however.

89 posted on 06/13/2002 9:04:10 PM PDT by Willie Green
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Sir Gawain
What really takes the cake is the manner in which President Bush continues to coddle illegal aliens. He refuses to deport those whom U.S. law requires to be deported, he continues to promote the concept of granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens, he refuses to take serious measures to keep likely terrorists out of our country, yet, he seems determined to thoroughly dismantle constitutional protection of our liberties.

Good summary of Bush's lack of regard for America's security from terrorism and sovereignty as a nation.

90 posted on 06/13/2002 9:04:24 PM PDT by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gunshy
Develope a civilian defense program similar to what we had during WWII

Uh, that is what the Homeland defense department is. Get it?

91 posted on 06/13/2002 9:04:35 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
I was going to comment, but after reading your reply, I find there is really nothing left to say on the matter. Case closed.
92 posted on 06/13/2002 9:05:37 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
Meanwhile our enemies circle plotting our deaths while their assistants moan, groan and wringe their hands

Convenient how that open-ended War on Terror stifles arguments about internal policy leading to greater and greater administrative centralization, huh?

93 posted on 06/13/2002 9:07:35 PM PDT by Pistias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
What source do you have that outlines what this new agency is all about. I haven't seen it in print. Please elaborate.
94 posted on 06/13/2002 9:07:44 PM PDT by gunshy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: justshutupandtakeit
And I will wager you are a brainless boob. That is evident

LOL. You can call him a lot of names and be justified, but that isn't one of them.

95 posted on 06/13/2002 9:08:36 PM PDT by Pistias
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gunshy
What source do you have that outlines what this new agency is all about. I haven't seen it in print. Please elaborate.

Look on the Whitehouse web site.

96 posted on 06/13/2002 9:08:51 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: gunshy
Tell me exactly how the restructuring of already existing government agencies restricted your rights?

Maybe if you quit talking in unsubstantiated generalities your point would actually surface...or not.

97 posted on 06/13/2002 9:10:45 PM PDT by Luis Gonzalez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
Most likely not ! LOL
98 posted on 06/13/2002 9:14:17 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
Where is the plan for evacuation. Where is the plan for innoculation in the event of a bio-hazard attack. Where is the plan for dealing with contaminated water etc, etc, etc. These plans should have been developed starting on 9/12/2002 if Bush was serious about protecting this country.

All Bush has done is to create the worlds largest police force to spy on americans. The new gestapo. Sleep well my friend, at least until they haul you away.

99 posted on 06/13/2002 9:16:35 PM PDT by gunshy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: lakey
According to the 2000 US Census, Euro Americans make up 63% of the US population now, of course they don't count the very conservative figgure of 12 million illegals. If legal immigration levels remain the same by 2007 we will be 60%, by 2010 we will be 58% of the population.

The thing is, immigration is growing not remaining static, immigration in the last decade was HUGE compared to previous decades and still growing. We are in what is joking refered to as the "War on Terror", I prefer to call it the "War of Terror" and it isn't being waged against Islamic extremists, but on native born Euro Americans.

How else does one explain the sudden blindness of poll watching politicians when it happens to be an immigration opinion poll?

100 posted on 06/13/2002 9:16:49 PM PDT by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 721 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson