Bush Pushes Gore Plan For Orwellian Government

NewsWithViews.com ^ | Chuck Baldwin

[Sir Gawain]

BUSH PUSHES GORE PLAN FOR ORWELLIAN GOVERNMENT

 

By Chuck Baldwin

June 11, 2002

NewsWithViews.com

Those who voted for G. W. Bush thinking they were getting a significantly different type of government from the Clinton-Gore years need to think again. Bush's proposal to consolidate federal law enforcement and civil defense capabilities is actually a replay of an old plan first submitted by Al Gore.

A June 10 CNS news report stated, "Some members of Congress, Democrats and Republicans alike, were surprised by President Bush's proposed consolidation of federal law enforcement and civil defense capabilities under a new cabinet level Department of Homeland Security.

"But some are even more surprised to learn the plan has much in common with a nine-year-old idea hatched in the Clinton-Gore administration, which proposed a significant expansion of domestic police powers."

The report further stated, "Numerous components of President Bush's proposal, which were sketched out in a televised address last Thursday, are strikingly similar to a plan proposed by former Vice President Al Gore as part of the Clinton-Gore 'Partnership for Reinventing Government' in 1993."

The Bush-Gore plan to "reinvent government" is, in fact, nothing new. It is as old as tyranny itself - and that is exactly what the Bush-Gore plan is: a modern attempt to reinstall tyrannical government.

In the British newspaper, The Register, Thomas Greene states, "The real purpose (of Bush's proposal), clearly, is data acquisition, mining and manipulation on a gargantuan scale." He is right. Bush's reintroduction of the Clinton-Gore plan has shades of Hitler's SS corps. It is the beginning of a national police force in the United States.

Of course, when Al Gore submitted this plan back in 1993, vociferous opposition from the entire conservative community resisted it. As a result, the plan was summarily defeated.

However, things are different now. A Republican occupies the White House. Furthermore, the terrorist attacks in New York and Washington have created a "security-at-all-costs" mentality among the American people. Because of this, Bush will succeed in implementing the Clinton-Gore plan of freedom confiscation with little or no opposition.

What really takes the cake is the manner in which President Bush continues to coddle illegal aliens. He refuses to deport those whom U.S. law requires to be deported, he continues to promote the concept of granting amnesty to millions of illegal aliens, he refuses to take serious measures to keep likely terrorists out of our country, yet, he seems determined to thoroughly dismantle constitutional protection of our liberties.

What conservatives would have never surrendered to Al Gore, they seem happy to acquiesce to George Bush. However, the Clinton- Gore plan to eviscerate America's liberties smells as rotten (even worse) when George Bush regurgitates it! So, what has happened to conservatives' smellers?

 

[Jorge]

I dunno. Any suggestions?

[Luis Gonzalez]

So, in spite of all the crap, I can understand WHY the re-organization of these domestic intelligence agencies in the aftermath of 9/11 became an issue. They failed to do their job.

What I don't understand is the reaction from many in here. They are the very same people who are bitching up a storm about the fact that our government has not militarized (or mined) the borders (forget about the 1 billion Muslims ready to destroy us, get that mexican mom and her kids!!!), instituted racial profiling of anyone who doesn't look like Dolph Lundgren, or enacted a constitutional amendment outlawing Islam (proposed by a self-proclaimed constitutionalist no less).

My question is real simple. Why did Al and Bill want to do this nine years ago?

[Nick Danger]

I wish somebody could explain to me, without just trying to regale me with scary rhetoric, how combining the mighty Coast Guard, the fearsome Customs Service, the incompetent and useless Immigration and Naturalization Service, and a couple of players to be named later, constitutes some huge Threat To The Republic.

Here is this ridiculous article by Chuck Baldwin, using terms like "tyrannical government" and "Hitler's SS Corps," to describe what amounts to a border-tightening by agencies that so far haven't been able to find their own rear ends with a flashlight. Move their little boxes around on an org chart, we are told, and they will suddenly spring forth from their cocoons wearing Waffen SS uniforms, capable of actually doing something scarier than approving Mohammad Atta's visa months after he drove an airplane into the WTC.

What's even more amazing is that half the people here cheering Chuckie on with this nonsense can be found in other threads crabbing about how Bush won't do anything to secure the borders. Feh.

[Texasforever]

A bunch of social engineering Bull shit you are peddling!

It appears you are quite a connoisseur of that particular commodity in your own right.

[Texasforever]

What's even more amazing is that half the people here cheering Chuckie on with this nonsense can be found in other threads crabbing about how Bush won't do anything to secure the borders. Feh.

Short term memory problems? Maybe just a genetic never satisfied condition.

[Luis Gonzalez]

Well, a genius.

Please point out exactly what I am "peddling".

[Luis Gonzalez]

"What's even more amazing is that half the people here cheering Chuckie on with this nonsense can be found in other threads crabbing about how Bush won't do anything to secure the borders. Feh."

Hey Nick

Here we are, faced with a very real threat to the continuance of this Republic, a threat that clearly points to the 1 billion Muslims in this world, and these idiots are still screaming that we will be brought down by dirt-poor mexican farm hands.

[Luis Gonzalez]

And where did I "peddle" that?

[Luis Gonzalez]

Hey genius...try this one on for size. The problem is the welfare state. There would be no one taking if we weren't giving.

But it's easier to blame Mexicans,

[gunshy]

Yeah, we've had so many terrorist attacks on this country since 911. I don't believe for a moment that Bush has any plans to protect this country, he only wants to see his dads' dreams of defeating Saddam and creating the new world order. Bush, like his dad, is a fraud.

[Texasforever]

I think you may have found your e-mailer.

[Luis Gonzalez]

Can you point me to one instance of a Mexican dirt farmer threatening the national security?

[Luis Gonzalez]

So, what you're in effect saying is that the fact that we haven't been attacked since 9/11 (I guess we can forget about that whole anthrax thing) is proof that the measures the administration have taken to prevent attacks do not work?

gunshy...meet daiuy, may you both live happily ever after.

[Luis Gonzalez]

In other words, no answer.