Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NYPD Police Chief nixes idea of armed Jewish patrols in Brooklyn
Jerusalem Post ^ | 6-11-02

Posted on 06/11/2002 5:47:16 AM PDT by SJackson

NEW YORK - New York Police Commissioner Ray Kelly said the use of armed patrols to protect Jewish neighborhoods in Brooklyn was simply out of the question.

"The department will not tolerate anyone brandishing weapons under the guise of protecting others," Kelly said in a statement Monday. "Anyone attempting to patrol the streets armed with weapons will be arrested."

Kelly's statement came in response to a proposal made Sunday by Rabbi Yakove Lloyd, president of the right-wing Jewish Defense Group, that citizens armed with shotguns patrol the heavily Jewish Borough Park and southern Flatbush neighborhoods of Brooklyn because of comments a suspected terrorist made about targeting them.

Lloyd had said the patrols of 50 to 200 people would carry shotguns in bags, along with people licensed to own and carry other types of firearms. Others would carry bats, pipes, cell phones and walkie-talkies. The patrols were to start on June 16.

"Any move in this direction is counterproductive," Kelly later added at a press conference in Queens. "The tenor of this is wrong. We don't need this."

Lloyd did not immediately return a call for comment on Monday.

Several other leaders in the Jewish community have lined up to criticize the plan.

Assemblyman Dov Hikind, whose district includes Borough Park, called the idea outrageous.

"Don't think of coming into our neighborhoods to stir up trouble," he said "We don't want you and we don't need you."

"We don't believe in vigilantism," Daniel Botnick, director of the Crown Heights Jewish Community Council said Monday. "It's not only shortsighted, it's irresponsible."

Botnick said the heavily Jewish areas of Crown Heights have a civilian patrol, but they are unarmed.

Lloyd's idea was in response to the comments that Abdul Rahman Yasin made during an interview on CBS television's "60 Minutes" on June 2.

Yasin, who is sought by the FBI in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, said in the interview from a compound in Iraq that he and his accomplices originally targeted heavily Jewish neighborhoods in Brooklyn. They later decided to attack the twin towers because they believed most of their occupants were Jewish, Yasin said.

Six people were killed and more than 1,000 were injured in the bombing.

The Jewish Defense Group was founded by Lloyd in Queens in 1985, and follows the principles of the late Rabbi Meir Kahane, founder of the right-wing Jewish Defense League.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 06/11/2002 5:47:16 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I have always wondered why the Jewish vote always supports in mass the most anti-gun candidate (usually democrat). Do they even see and cause and effect? Do they now thank the (mostly) Republicans candidates who have protected the 2nd Amendment (which in this case is trying to be used as precisely as intended by the founding fathers)?
2 posted on 06/11/2002 5:53:26 AM PDT by 2banana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
What part of "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed" does this blithering fool not understand?
3 posted on 06/11/2002 5:55:11 AM PDT by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
Looks like the chief isn't wanting any competition ... might raise questions if the citizens posse, just by their mere presence, lowered crime rates.
4 posted on 06/11/2002 5:56:46 AM PDT by GhengisKhan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"The department will not tolerate anyone brandishing weapons under the guise of protecting others,"

"The department will not tolerate anyone brandishing weapons under the guise of protecting others," The worst offense, in the liberal mind, is being able to rely on something or someone other than "The Government". Such reliance is a formula for disaster. "The Government" needs victims in order to place more restrictions on their subjects.

5 posted on 06/11/2002 5:58:42 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
When the first Jew is harmed in that area and the police weren't there to stop it, can they string this guy up?
6 posted on 06/11/2002 6:07:33 AM PDT by Quila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

To: SJackson
"The department will not tolerate anyone brandishing weapons under the guise of protecting others,"...

Here's hoping the Jews of New York have the backbone to stand, armed, and defend themselves instead of depending on this horsesa$$.

Boonie Rat

MACV SOCOM, PhuBai/Hue '65-'66

8 posted on 06/11/2002 6:21:49 AM PDT by Boonie Rat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Boonie Rat
IF THE POLICE CANNOT OR WILL NOT PROTECT THE PEOPLE,WE THE PEOPLE WILL!!!!
9 posted on 06/11/2002 6:57:06 AM PDT by jocko12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
I have always wondered why the Jewish vote always supports in mass the most anti-gun candidate (usually democrat). Do they even see and cause and effect?

I think you're looking at two reasons. First, it's a disproportionate urban population, thus not the contact with firearms that non urban residents have. Second, for many in America there hasn’t been a perceived threat to the Jewish community. Many don’t see it now.

I’d also suggest that on FR most posters take a strong constitutional 2nd Amendment and self defense stand, that is probably a minority view even amongst Republicans. I’m constantly amazed at the number of hunters and fisherman who have no concerns about “assault weapon bans”, and who regularly vote Dem.

10 posted on 06/11/2002 6:57:27 AM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
New York Police Commissioner Ray Kelly said the use of armed patrols to protect Jewish neighborhoods in Brooklyn was simply out of the question.

Ray Kelly is back in town. He was the police chief that allowed the "venting" during the Crown Heights anti-Jewish riots.

11 posted on 06/11/2002 7:09:28 AM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"Any move in this direction is counterproductive," Kelly later added at a press conference in Queens. "The tenor of this is wrong. We don't need this."

Of course it is wrong. We can not allow any ethnic or social group to band together in the common defense. All must be sheep unless you are a Black Panther then it is politically correct (Jews are not the acceptable minority). The tenor of self defense is also wrong as it inspires people to resist slavery or, as in the case of the Jews, extermination. No, we (the power elite) don't need this. Reduction of crime through self help might inspire mass resistance to government property taking, school board lunacy, unjust taxes or you name the outrage. Of course we don't need this.

12 posted on 06/11/2002 7:20:48 AM PDT by Lion Den Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
"Don't think of coming into our neighborhoods to stir up trouble"

13 posted on 06/11/2002 7:21:32 AM PDT by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
Ray Kelly is back in town. He was the police chief that allowed the "venting" during the Crown Heights anti-Jewish riots.

Actually, that would be Lee "Get out of Town" Brown, now the Mayor of Houston. Kelly was, however, in the police bureaucracy at the time and later suceeded Brown as Commish after the Crown Heights pogrom.

14 posted on 06/11/2002 7:22:24 AM PDT by Clemenza
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SJackson
I think we've been put on notice that the police have rights and privileges that you and I do not -- including the privilege of deciding what needs protecting, and by what means. And I think Commissioner Kelly will soon be very, very sorry for his statement.

Freedom, Wealth, and Peace,
Francis W. Porretto
Visit The Palace Of Reason: http://palaceofreason.com

15 posted on 06/11/2002 7:33:05 AM PDT by fporretto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2banana
We can't protect you.

You can't protect yourself.

We will however, show up after you are dead and conduct a cursory investigation. On the five percent chance your murderer wanders into a police station drunk and is accidentally caught, we promise to plea bargain him to a sentence of no less than one year and five months, with time off for good behavior.

16 posted on 06/11/2002 10:19:02 AM PDT by bloggerjohn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: shigure
Time for civil disobedience in Brooklyn.
Who is going to try to arrest 50 or more armed, peaceable locals?

The same NYPD we honor for their valor on 9/11. Different hats. Concealed carry has swept the nation in the last decade. Though my time is spent in two of the unswept states, this isn't a time for disobedience. I think the logic of armed citizens is carrying the day. Disobedience plays into the gunowners as crazies myth.

In saying that, I realize that like New Yorkers it will be years for me, but we're moving in the right direction.

18 posted on 06/11/2002 4:22:08 PM PDT by SJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson