Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kevin Curry
This move is only possible now, it seems to me, because the entrenched bureacracies are in a weak position to defend their turf. To say the Administration is "creating a new bureacracy" is an oversimplification, probably intentional. How can this be strictly an increase in bureacracy if nearly 100 Congressional committees are threatened by it? Are they not bureacracies? If all of that-ahem-oversight can be consolidated, while at the same time making the information flow more efficient, and uniting under one head the various groups who must meet the post 9-11 priorities, what the heck is wrong--from an organizational standpoint--about that?

But hey, what do I know?

30 posted on 06/11/2002 7:27:07 AM PDT by Huck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Huck
How can this be strictly an increase in bureacracy if nearly 100 Congressional committees are threatened by it?

Last I checked, Congress was a seperate branch of government. The Executive could no more threaten Congress by re-organzing an agency then it could threaten men on mars.

31 posted on 06/11/2002 7:58:12 AM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson