Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Barb Easton next witness in the Van Dam Murder Case!!
Union Trib ^ | June 11, 2002 | Kristen Green

Posted on 06/10/2002 10:17:56 PM PDT by FresnoDA

STILL 'ENORMOUS AMOUNT TO LEARN'

By Kristen Green 
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

June 9, 2002

New physical evidence about Danielle van Dam's disappearance and salacious details about her parents' sex life came out during the first week of David Westerfield's capital murder trial.

Legal experts say it's too early to determine the significance those facts will have on the outcome of the case.

The trial moved along fairly quickly, as both Brenda and Damon van Dam took the stand to testify about the events leading up to their 7-year-old daughter's disappearance. Attorneys have said the trial could last as long as 11 more weeks.

"I think there's an enormous amount to learn in this case, and we're not going to know it all until the end," said San Diego criminal defense attorney Knut Johnson, who is not involved in the trial.

The San Diego Superior Court testimony hinted at, but didn't fully explain, the prosecution's theory of how Westerfield, 50, might have entered the van Dam home and kidnapped Danielle.

Westerfield's lead attorney, meanwhile, told the jury that scientific evidence would prove his client's innocence.

In his opening statements, Steven Feldman suggested Danielle could have been kidnapped by any number of people her parents invited into their home to engage in "risque behavior." His strategy, experts say, is to raise questions in jurors' minds about whether someone other than Westerfield could have kidnapped the girl.

But Deputy District Attorney Jeff Dusek told the jury he has physical evidence that connects Westerfield to Danielle's death. He said the second-grader's blood, hair and fingerprints were found in Westerfield's motor home, which he occasionally parked in front of his Sabre Springs residence. When Danielle was taken from her bed, Westerfield lived two houses from the van Dams.

Dusek told the jury that Danielle's hair was also found in the trash in Westerfield's garage and that fibers similar to those in her bedroom were discovered in the motor home. The prosecutor said fibers found inside the bag in which authorities placed Danielle's body before the autopsy matched fibers in Westerfield's laundry room. Dusek didn't elaborate on what kind of fibers were found.

Danielle's nude body was discovered Feb. 27 under a tree on Dehesa Road, 25 days after her mother went to wake her for breakfast and realized she wasn't in her bed. Westerfield was arrested Feb. 22.

Throughout the first week of the trial, the attorneys showcased two completely different styles, which experts say were indicative of their personalities. Feldman is an animated performer, gesturing wildly during his opening statement and questioning of witnesses. Dusek, meanwhile, projects an image of somber dignity with his deep voice, subdued delivery and chiseled looks.

But it's hard to say whether the men's styles will have much impact on the jury deliberations.

"They're both very competent, very able in the courtroom, and they both know their case," said San Diego criminal defense lawyer Michael Pancer. "One might be more interesting to listen to than the other, but in the end, I don't think that's what matters."

Legal experts said the prosecution put Damon and Brenda van Dam on the witness stand early on to establish the sequence of events the night before Danielle disappeared.

"That's the most compelling emotional testimony in the case," Johnson said.

Damon van Dam testified that he stayed home Feb. 1 to baby-sit the couple's three children while Brenda went out to a Poway bar with two friends.

She testified that David Westerfield was at the bar when she and her friends got there, and that he bought them drinks. She said she doesn't know what time he left the bar.

Damon van Dam testified that he put the kids to bed at 10 p.m. and fell asleep before 11 p.m. He awoke at 1:45 a.m. because his dog, Layla, a Weimaraner, was whimpering. The dog doesn't bark because she grew up on a farm where the dogs had been rendered mute.

He said he let Layla into the back yard to relieve herself and then brought the dog back inside a few minutes later.

When Brenda van Dam returned about 2 a.m. with two girlfriends and two male friends who were also partying at the bar, she noticed a red light flashing on the home security system.

She searched for an open door or window and found a side garage door open. The door had been opened earlier in the evening when she and her friends were smoking marijuana in the garage.

When the couple's friends left about 2:30 p.m., after snacking on cookies and reheated pizza, Damon and Brenda van Dam went to bed.

About 3:15 or 3:30 a.m., Damon van Dam awoke and noticed a red light flashing on the security system. He went downstairs and found a sliding glass door leading to the back yard open 6 to 10 inches. He closed it and went to bed.

Experts said those details will be vital for the jury to understand how and when someone might have slipped in and out of the house.

After testifying about the sequence of events leading up to Danielle's kidnapping, the couple also answered Feldman's questions about their sex lives. Television viewers across the nation learned about Damon and Brenda van Dam's extramarital activities, as Court TV broadcast the trial live.

Brenda van Dam admitted to having sex with her two girlfriends and their partners, and Damon van Dam admitted he had sex with both of Brenda's girlfriends. He also said he didn't tell police that he smoked marijuana the night before Danielle disappeared because he didn't want to get into trouble.

Damon van Dam completed his testimony Wednesday; his wife completed hers Thursday.

It will be the jury's responsibility to decide whether any of the details of their personal life are relevant to the issue of who killed Danielle.

The couple's appearance on the witness stand drew dozens of curious San Diegans to the courthouse to vie for a seat in a courtroom filled with spectators each day.

The van Dams' testimony also was broadcast live by most local television stations, which pre-empted normal programming.

This week could be less interesting for onlookers, as experts believe the prosecution will begin presenting scientific evidence about DNA.

A gag order in the case prevents the attorneys from commenting on the case or releasing a list of the 75 witnesses they plan to call.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 741-756 next last
To: Rheo
Also confused on Damons testimony of June 5...he said Brenda was in the shower when the gals arrived....in the PH hearing he said she was upstairs and he got the door.

Denise said Brenda and Danielle were outside and jumped out from behind the truck.

621 posted on 06/11/2002 11:14:04 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 619 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
Not to mention the fact there is a street light nearby ....I believe DVD testified that they used that as a night light for Danielle.
622 posted on 06/11/2002 11:14:09 PM PDT by Mrs.Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies]

To: Mrs.Liberty
Exactly....good point...that's why he left the curtains open.
623 posted on 06/11/2002 11:14:59 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies]

To: Rheo;All
According to the "brilliant" CTV anchor, "They allege that he carried her across the street to his RV, which was parked at his house that night." Pathetic!! That woman truly knows nothing about this case.
624 posted on 06/11/2002 11:17:21 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
I don't have any theory. Just alot of doubt about all of this. And lots of questions. I still can't figure out how he was able to get in the VD house undetected much less find her room,etc.
625 posted on 06/11/2002 11:18:31 PM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 617 | View Replies]

To: Politicalmom
Is that the same brilliant Nancy who said how traumatic it must have been yelling and searching for their daughter at 3am!
626 posted on 06/11/2002 11:19:03 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 624 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
DVD June 5....SHE'S 24 GOT CORNER WINDOWS, AND I OPENED THE BINDS SO THERE'S 25 STREETLIGHT SHINING FOR LIKE IN THE ROOM..
627 posted on 06/11/2002 11:19:43 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Not to mention the fact there is a street light nearby ....I believe DVD testified that they used that as a night light for Danielle.

I guess that if he did commit this horrible murder, then he had the planets all in alignment for him to give him the most incredible luck in the world that night. Absolutely everything went right for him. Unfortunately, the next day, after a flawless kidnapping, he left clues everywhere, got stuck everywhere, left wallets, blood, hair, and everything else behind.

The execution of it was brilliant; the follow up was as sloppy as can be.

Then, what the heck happened to his all of his luck?
628 posted on 06/11/2002 11:20:31 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 623 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
A. YEAH. THERE'S STREETLIGHTS OUT FRONT OF THOSE 7 WINDOWS, AND ACTUALLY THE BLINDS ARE OPEN FROM WHEN I LIFT THEM 8 OPEN FOR HER, FOR THE LIGHT FOR HER
629 posted on 06/11/2002 11:23:40 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 627 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
I used to work in the criminal justice system as a CFO, and I can tell you without any doubt that the parents are scumb, and that "mother" is a pig who caused her little girl's death.
630 posted on 06/11/2002 11:31:17 PM PDT by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
I am really beginning to think that Westerfield may not be involved in this. The detectives confirmed my doubts. Westerfield was sweating, left his water hose out, was too cooperative...so he becomes a suspect. No other homes were searched? Everyone else cleared within hours. I also don't trust Keenes memory of unsolicited remarks Westerfield supposedly made. So many questions, very few answers.
631 posted on 06/11/2002 11:31:50 PM PDT by Jrabbit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 618 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
That's the one. The same one who doesn't grasp the concept of "impeaching a witness", and makes HIGHLY sarcastic remarks every time the defense seems to be heading toward an explanation of something.
632 posted on 06/11/2002 11:38:23 PM PDT by Politicalmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 626 | View Replies]

To: onyx
hahahahaha My brother used to say a T in a PB I think this is more serious. They caused the murder of their daughter
633 posted on 06/11/2002 11:39:18 PM PDT by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
"I noticed that he was sweating profusely from under his arms," San Diego police Detective Johnny Keene (pictured, right) testified in the trial of David Westerfield.
Keene described the interview on Westerfield's front porch, two doors from the van Dam home, on a cool Monday morning in early February.

If I recall this officers testimony correctly he also attributed his own attire of a shirt and a jacket to the "coolness of the morning." Then when asked why he moved DW and their conversation to DW's front porch did he or did he not almost say that it was getting too warm to be standing in the sunlight of the front yard? Just an observation, he makes a good recovery to back up the senario he's already drawn.
Another thing, isn't this when DW comes home and has to park down the street from his house? He dosen't look like he's used to much excercise how far was that walk? Half a block? More maybe?

634 posted on 06/11/2002 11:42:05 PM PDT by alexandria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: FresnoDA
Mudd agreed to the request after Dusek said he had finished calling witnesses to talk about the van Dam's lifestyle, but said the couple might have to leave the courtroom again if future testimony touched on their actions.

I just read this. Does that mean Barbara Easton is NOT going to testify, at all? Or is she going to be a witness for the defense?
635 posted on 06/11/2002 11:42:25 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies]

To: Jrabbit
They certainly have a lot of explaining left to do to take away reasonable doubt!....if they cannot explain how he got out of the house w/out trace evidence...got her away from the house on a fully lit street..how his vehicle had no trace evidence...how he transfered her to the MH, etc, I will have doubt.

I want to know if the VD's vehicles were checked and everyone of the people that were in that house....including all their computers.

636 posted on 06/11/2002 11:44:34 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 631 | View Replies]

To: alexandria
I also heard that...had to move to the porch for shade or something??

At this point, DW was back from camping so it is not the time he came back for his wallet..3:30 on 2/2 was when he had to walk...this was 2/4, I believe.

637 posted on 06/11/2002 11:47:06 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 634 | View Replies]

To: sbnsd
hmmmm....finished calling witnesses that referenced their lifestyle...that would include Barbara.

Maybe the prosecution is waiting on her and then the VD's will have to leave...but why not call her now?

Very interesting.

638 posted on 06/11/2002 11:50:37 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 635 | View Replies]

To: theirjustdue
Of course if it were an "olefin" fabric it would have looked great after bleaching, but turned to dust, as soon as it was touched.

Not true.

639 posted on 06/11/2002 11:52:45 PM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 288 | View Replies]

To: Rheo
Maybe the prosecution is waiting on her and then the VD's will have to leave...but why not call her now?

The only reason I can think for the prosecution to not call her would be if her testimony would be damaging to their case. Since she's more in this story than almost anyone except Denise, I don't get why they wouldn't call her. She's the one that DW wanted to meet. She was the one groping Garry's friend, the waitress from O'Harley's. I can't recall her name. Barbara's a wild woman; maybe she will be called by the defense as a hostile witness.
640 posted on 06/11/2002 11:57:04 PM PDT by sbnsd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 638 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 601-620621-640641-660 ... 741-756 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson