[donh]

massive computational attempts to look back in history, as proof, has little to do with science

So why did Sagan and Muncaster do it?

Kindly give me a link to the PROOF that Sagan and Muncaster published. It's brain-drizzle, not science, whether it's done by Behe or Sagan.

[Tribune7]

Here's the sources for Sagan/Muncaster

Creationist Site

Talk.Origin

It's brain-drizzle, not science, whether it's done by Behe or Sagan.

So Behe and Sagan have somehow less claim to scientific authority -- maybe I'll grant you Sagan -- than you? How about Hoyle? Or Crick? They've both said abiogenesis is impossible largely due to mathematical impossiblity.

What you are looking for is a miracle. You're next project should be finding the perpetual motion machine.