Skip to comments.
The History of the Bisexual Pride Flag
Biflag.com ^
| June 7, 2002
| Michael Page
Posted on 06/07/2002 4:32:44 AM PDT by H8DEMS
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: rabidralph
No, but NAMBLA was. The North American Marlon Brando Look-Alikes.
There was a scene with the FBI charging into the room. After Mephisto straightened things out by explaining that the feds were looking for that other NAMBLA, Mr. Garrison said, "Aw, damnit, I'm at the wrong meeting!"
41
posted on
06/07/2002 11:49:49 AM PDT
by
Dimensio
To: Dimensio
LOL!
To: goodnesswins
Comment #44 Removed by Moderator
To: Pearls Before Swine
the statuary could be a hardened cement cast of a rectal cavity
To: Emmylou
Done chatting with you - obviously I'm too dumb to make any sense with you....buh bye....
To: goodnesswins
In other words, you're throwing a tantrum because your argument fell apart on even a casual glance and now you're going home.
Bye.
47
posted on
06/07/2002 12:53:16 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
To: SkyPilot
Touche Sky, touche.
To: Dimensio
No....I have better things to do with my life than focus on bi-sex....sheesh.....buh bye to you too....
To: Victoria Delsoul
I saw our US national flag reproduced in the rainbow colors of the militant homosexual agenda, a deliberate desecration of it and an insult to the American people and vetrans who died to preserve its dignity and our republic, not the states of Sodom and Gomorrah. What's next, the Pedophile Flag, the Dog Screwer's Banner, or the Corpse Pounder's Standard? No public venue should be provided at taxpayer's expense for deviant sexual groups anymore than it should be for terrorist enemies of America. Both seek the downfall of this country, only the sickos want to do it from within and with our money.
To: SkyPilot
That is the most absurd thing I have ever read. If I were you, I would study up on Morality 101 before you give advice againYou should read more carefully and engage brain before typing. He was referring to the definitions, not making a judgement on morality.
51
posted on
06/07/2002 1:07:17 PM PDT
by
cinFLA
To: Emmylou
Are you equating homosexulality with drinking? That's a false premis if I ever heard one.
To: cinFLA
It doesn't seem to matter to some people. Many months ago there was a thread where NAMBLA and some lawsuit against them was discussed and someone made a misstatement about the public agenda of NAMBLA (as in, what NAMBLA as a group claims to stand for, not necessarily what they really do). I corrected them because the statement was a factual error, and explained what their public agenda really was -- and I noted that I found said public agenda repugnant and devoid of any merit.
I was later branded as a NAMBLA supporter in that discussion, an accusation that was brought up again in another discussion.
53
posted on
06/07/2002 1:16:17 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
Comment #54 Removed by Moderator
To: Emmylou
Can I claim moral high ground by pointing out that I don't drink? Does this give me a right to point to alcoholics and drunkards as examples of "typical" members of the drinking community? Please?
55
posted on
06/07/2002 1:24:54 PM PDT
by
Dimensio
To: Emmylou
Wanna go out for a drink? Ooops.
To: bribriagain
Speaking of which, does anyone have a picture of a turkey baster with a mustache smoking a cigarette?
To: Right Wing Professor; skypilot
All these are simply terms for people who are sexually flexible and experimental. A cause needs a name though, in order to cast itself as victimized and in need of a societal category, special rights and protections.
To: anniegetyourgun
All these are simply terms for people who are sexually flexible and experimental. A cause needs a name though, in order to cast itself as victimized and in need of a societal category, special rights and protections.I think you're on to something. However, they all really do fit into one category. Specifically, sexual deviancy.
The human biological machine has an apetite for sex, just like it has an apetite for food. Without those God given apetites, the human race would perish. When the apetite get's screwed up, the machine dies, or dies off. For example, if you get a craving for anti-freeze and you just have to quench it - Well, you will be expiring quite soon. It is a deviency of sorts and not natural. It actually short circuits the whole reason for the apetite for food, to sustain the body.
Sexual deviancy is the same. It short circuits the whole purpose of the sexual apetite to begin with. The purpose is procreation. If God had not designed into men and women a strong desire to do what they do to make babies, man would have long since become extinct. When this desire gets messed up, you end up with people who are attracted to vegetables, animals, their own sex, tailpipes or a miriad of other activities that, no matter how vigorously practiced, cannot possibly conceive another human soul.
Same sex attraction is a deviancy and, yes, it is an apetite that can be aquired. That is why our children must be protected from this form of mental illness and deviant (not to mention physically dangerous) activity.
Calling it immoral and unacceptable is a good start...
59
posted on
06/07/2002 5:25:53 PM PDT
by
RobRoy
To: rebelsoldier
Good point. I totally agree with you.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson