The History of the Bisexual Pride Flag

Biflag.com ^ | June 7, 2002 | Michael Page

[Dimensio]

No, but NAMBLA was. The North American Marlon Brando Look-Alikes.

There was a scene with the FBI charging into the room. After Mephisto straightened things out by explaining that the feds were looking for that other NAMBLA, Mr. Garrison said, "Aw, damnit, I'm at the wrong meeting!"

[rabidralph]

LOL!

[Hillary's Lovely Legs]

[Republicus2001]

the statuary could be a hardened cement cast of a rectal cavity

[goodnesswins]

Done chatting with you - obviously I'm too dumb to make any sense with you....buh bye....

[Dimensio]

In other words, you're throwing a tantrum because your argument fell apart on even a casual glance and now you're going home.

Bye.

[rebelsoldier]

Touche Sky, touche.

[goodnesswins]

No....I have better things to do with my life than focus on bi-sex....sheesh.....buh bye to you too....

[rebelsoldier]

I saw our US national flag reproduced in the rainbow colors of the militant homosexual agenda, a deliberate desecration of it and an insult to the American people and vetrans who died to preserve its dignity and our republic, not the states of Sodom and Gomorrah. What's next, the Pedophile Flag, the Dog Screwer's Banner, or the Corpse Pounder's Standard? No public venue should be provided at taxpayer's expense for deviant sexual groups anymore than it should be for terrorist enemies of America. Both seek the downfall of this country, only the sickos want to do it from within and with our money.

[cinFLA]

That is the most absurd thing I have ever read. If I were you, I would study up on Morality 101 before you give advice again

You should read more carefully and engage brain before typing. He was referring to the definitions, not making a judgement on morality.

[bribriagain]

Are you equating homosexulality with drinking? That's a false premis if I ever heard one.

[Dimensio]

It doesn't seem to matter to some people. Many months ago there was a thread where NAMBLA and some lawsuit against them was discussed and someone made a misstatement about the public agenda of NAMBLA (as in, what NAMBLA as a group claims to stand for, not necessarily what they really do). I corrected them because the statement was a factual error, and explained what their public agenda really was -- and I noted that I found said public agenda repugnant and devoid of any merit.

I was later branded as a NAMBLA supporter in that discussion, an accusation that was brought up again in another discussion.

[Dimensio]

Can I claim moral high ground by pointing out that I don't drink? Does this give me a right to point to alcoholics and drunkards as examples of "typical" members of the drinking community? Please?

[bribriagain]

Wanna go out for a drink? Ooops.

[bribriagain]

Speaking of which, does anyone have a picture of a turkey baster with a mustache smoking a cigarette?

[anniegetyourgun]

All these are simply terms for people who are sexually flexible and experimental. A cause needs a name though, in order to cast itself as victimized and in need of a societal category, special rights and protections.

[RobRoy]

All these are simply terms for people who are sexually flexible and experimental. A cause needs a name though, in order to cast itself as victimized and in need of a societal category, special rights and protections.

I think you're on to something. However, they all really do fit into one category. Specifically, sexual deviancy.

The human biological machine has an apetite for sex, just like it has an apetite for food. Without those God given apetites, the human race would perish. When the apetite get's screwed up, the machine dies, or dies off. For example, if you get a craving for anti-freeze and you just have to quench it - Well, you will be expiring quite soon. It is a deviency of sorts and not natural. It actually short circuits the whole reason for the apetite for food, to sustain the body.

Sexual deviancy is the same. It short circuits the whole purpose of the sexual apetite to begin with. The purpose is procreation. If God had not designed into men and women a strong desire to do what they do to make babies, man would have long since become extinct. When this desire gets messed up, you end up with people who are attracted to vegetables, animals, their own sex, tailpipes or a miriad of other activities that, no matter how vigorously practiced, cannot possibly conceive another human soul.

Same sex attraction is a deviancy and, yes, it is an apetite that can be aquired. That is why our children must be protected from this form of mental illness and deviant (not to mention physically dangerous) activity.

Calling it immoral and unacceptable is a good start...

[Victoria Delsoul]

Good point. I totally agree with you.