Surely not, since she was in charge of FOIA requests?
You noticed that also huh??
Agreed. I read this article just to see what Freepers thought of her. I was completetly disinterested in what she said at the hearings. There was no thoughtful analysis about what the problems were or what caused them. Every other sentence mentioned "the beauraucracy" and how great it was that she knew how to type so well (because the quality of the computers were so poor). When Schumer lobbed her a softball question about why the technology was so bad she responded that she, "had not thought about an answer to that particular question." She wasn't dodging the question, this woman was incapable of dodging...she truly hadn't thought about this huge problem.
Question:
What did she write in her 13 page memo?
I'm don't know, but if it is anything like her response to the questions at these hearings it is a babling, superficial, mediocre analysis of the problems at the FBI.
Rowley isn't the typical polished show horse that Congress likes to invite to listen to themselves pontificate on how great they are to give their "guest" the time of day. But she is bright, has an innate common sense and has good instincts. She knows her job, knows the law and knows the ropes of her job.
She also is not impressed with peoples' positions, and she isn't afraid to rock the boat. I'll take that over the pompous bs Tenet and Mueller pitch out left and right, thank you.