Skip to comments.
Damon Van Dam Testifies Tearfully, Fends Off Lifestyle Attack:Day 3 of Westerfield Trial
CourtTV ^
| June 6, 2002
| CourtTV
Posted on 06/05/2002 11:36:24 PM PDT by FresnoDA
DAY 3: Westerfield On Trial
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: vandam; westerfield
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560, 561-580, 581-600 ... 861-876 next last
To: FresnoDA
Just a couple of thoughts here, off the top of my head, after reading some of the posts today:
1) What if Brenda "knew" DW better than she's admitting? She's over at the house, he gives her the "wink wink" and says to her kids something like, "Hey, kids! The door to the motorhome's open! Why don't you go check it out?" (I know that, when I was younger, I thought any kind of home on wheels was cool). This leaves Mommy and DW time for some "quick" hijinks, and could put DNA evidence in the motorhome.
2) This thing with Rich saying (to DW), "We know what you're about!" Rich was the baseball coach who was dealing pot, was he not? The one that Brenda ratted out recently? Is it possible that, with DW cozying up to BVD and friends that someone thought he (DW) was a cop - a narc? Or vice, perhaps? This would explain the confrontation, and the fact that everyone "closed up" on DW. It would also give someone a motive for pointing the finger at DW...
If my recollections of who the dealer was are incorrect, forget I even mentioned it :P
To: Politicalmom
She got the hours corrected a long time ago.
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
Are the transcripts available Kim?
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I don't know how the neighbors know DW, but familiarity breeds contempt.
To: FresnoDA
Lots of family names were shortened when they came over from Europe. Do you suppose the VanDam's last name used to be VanDamnem?
To: FresnoDA
has he ever been photographed in a short sleeve shirt? Maybe hiding tatoos??Interesting observation. Or perhaps hiding track marks?
To: RnMomof7
I've not looked at websleuths for them yet.
To: MizSterious
Feldman, questioning Brenda VD.....Interesting....
5:30-6:00 P.M., Feb 2 did a Uniform Officer tell you that Damon had disclosed "the sex" and it was OK to talk about it.
Did the police tell you that they had talked to Barbara Easton, and she told them many things that happened the night of Feb. 1st?
Did you then disclose your full relationship, on Feb 3, at 2:13 A.M. in the morning!!
WOW, Brenda VD staying up late at night with the SDPD....
To: PoisedWoman
Uh-oh.......Damon's porn habits might get aired.
To: let freedom sing
Feldman....
Did you observe your husband, Damon, viewing NAKED PICTURES of 20 year old women?
Ahhhh....OBJECTIONS.....Side Bar.....
Sounds like we are going to talk about Pornography on The Demons computer......
KIM ALERT....KIM ALERT....
Animation??
Bestiality??
Prepubescent??
Ahhhhh......
HARD DRIVE ALERT!!!
To: ALL
IMO, poor Dusek is very ineffective. When he tries to clean up after Brenda and Damon it is somehow tainted by the vulgar reality.
There is a subtle discomfort in putting LE and this disgusting couple on the same team.
I realize that they have no choice, but it sure isn't a pretty picture.
To: Lucky
I believe on 2/5 or 2/7 they hauled off the VD's computers.
572
posted on
06/06/2002 3:53:26 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: Politicalmom
I never said anything about the time of this I simply stated to another that I would not have let my 10 year old go to neighbors when another of my children were missing. In fact your post 559 agrees with me. Perhaps you need to go back and read my posts and then decide who is being rude....besides the time was corrected to me at around 4 pm est and I have left you at least 2 separate posts that you have not responded too..again who is being rude....
To: FresnoDA
I guess Dusek thinks a quick spray of perfume will take away the strong stench. Unfortunately, his atomizer is clogged on top of everything else. It still STINKS !!!!!!
To: ~Kim4VRWC's~
I just pointed out who's house it was at.
575
posted on
06/06/2002 3:57:07 PM PDT
by
Jaded
To: NatureGirl
What if Brenda "knew" DW better than she's admitting Not even Feldman has hinted at this.
To: rolling_stone
I didn't hear any more about the phone tap - but could only watch Court TV. What do you suppose that was all about? Why do you think it wasn't allowed - does Feldman just need to lay more groundwork first? I can't believe that if there was an incriminating statement on a phone tap - that it wouldn't be allowed to come out.
577
posted on
06/06/2002 3:59:50 PM PDT
by
mommya
To: alisasny
So as an innocent parent with a missing child you would have sent your 10 year old out into the street in the middle of the night in the dark to look for your other missing child????I never said anything about the time of this I simply stated to another that I would not have let my 10 year old go to neighbors when another of my children were missing.
If the two statements above are not both yours, there is someone else using your screenname.
Assuming that isn't the case, you are either embarrassed, dishonest, confused, or all three. Maybe some rest would do you good.
To: rolling_stone
Before the break Felman was asking Brenda about her phone being taped by the PD and about a call she received on I think 2/16... an objection was made then a sidebar..was this brought up again after lunch?
Yes! What might Feldman be aware of?
It may not be admissible now, because there is no foundation for it. It may take the expert testimony of LE to describe the tap, before it can even be broached to the VD's.
But I don't think we've heard the last of it. JMO
To: Southflanknorthpawsis
Who's talking to you?? Its not me.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560, 561-580, 581-600 ... 861-876 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson