Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: John Jamieson
Pretty strong statement for someone who hasn't heard all the evidence. Also unlikely to be true, even if it was Westerfield!

I don't agree. Like every single person in this forum (that includes you) I am expressing my own person "take on the trial". I am basing my opinions on the same news articles you are. In any "who dunnit" people will opine who may or may not have been the perp. I do not have the definative answer ... nor do you.

Westerfield according to his own account was not swinging or having a sexual relationship with either of the Van Dams. The Van Dams do not claim that Westerfield had a swinging relationship with them.

My statement says that Westerfield in all probablity killed Danielle even though they did not share a common swinging relationship. It sure looks like two unsavory couples living in close proximity.

Do you have information that the Van Dams and Westerfield were swinging together. I have yet to see ANYONE but you suggest this.

78 posted on 06/05/2002 5:29:14 PM PDT by BunnySlippers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]


To: BunnySlippers
I started out my writing with: "Westerfield is probably guilty", which is about the most you can say at this point.

Maybe he did it BECAUSE they wouldn't let him play in their sand box?

82 posted on 06/05/2002 5:34:56 PM PDT by John Jamieson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson