[John Jamieson]

I started out my writing with: "Westerfield is probably guilty", which is about the most you can say at this point.

Maybe he did it BECAUSE they wouldn't let him play in their sand box?

[BunnySlippers]

I started out my writing with: "Westerfield is probably guilty", which is about the most you can say at this point.

Maybe he did it BECAUSE they wouldn't let him play in their sand box?

Okay this is post 82.

I'd say perhaps it was one of my working theories early on.

From today's opening statements I know the prosecution is trying to establish that he was observing Danielle all along. I'm not sure they will be able to make a case for this but I personally think he was.

Therefore, I'm NOT SURE (no more no less) whether he was mad about not playing in their sandbox. Possibly.

[alisasny]

Maybe he did it BECAUSE they wouldn't let him play in their sand box?

SO he is a child murderer out of revenge?? He is mad at the parents so he kills a child, an innocent child??

Come on....yeah sex is great...but killing a child over disgruntled sex by and with adults ranks up there with I dont even know what....

Someone killed this little innocent and it was NOT her parents.....

How do you rectify that in your defense of the killer??

THINK ABOUT THAT TONIGHT