Replies

Next time, avoid the ad hominems.

Don't you have a suicide bombing appointment? 7 posted on 6/5/02 5:00 AM Pacific by Poohbah

Thank you. You just proved the point of this article with your latest burst of verbal flatulence. 14 posted on 6/5/02 5:14 AM Pacific by Poohbah

Which hardly supports the "refugee" status, but tramp will do. 15 posted on 6/5/02 5:15 AM Pacific by wita

BTW, you're doing a FINE job of convincing me that any world without Islam is a better place than the present world. 20 posted on 6/5/02 5:33 AM Pacific by Poohbah

Sounds to me like you do not understand what I was talking about, and merely opened your mouth to let your ignorance into the public domain. 32 posted on 6/5/02 6:00 AM Pacific by Poohbah

He did, but he only has so much brain power in reserve. After posting his idiotic comments there wasn't enough left over to move his body around.38 posted on 6/5/02 6:10 AM Pacific by AAABEST

What side is it again that uses ad hominum arguments?

What side is it again that uses ad hominum arguments?

The "mindless" comment was in post #3, before all the otheres. Not defending ad hominem in general, but LDD was first out of the box, then complains when it is served right back. If he wants to challenge support for Israel, let him do so with facts rather than initiating with a rant about the "mindlessness" of those who disagree. Else, he shouldn't complain that it gets served right back at him.

Is this specific enough for you- any supporter of the terrorist groups called "the Palestinian people" or the Islamaniacs acting on the views of Mad Mo (piss be upon his head) is not only my enemy, but the enemy of the United States and the human race.

I deal with facts and those are the facts.