Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leahy Dismisses Conservative Boycott Of Vermont - Hugh Hewitt says "Let's FReep these CREEPS!"
WCAX-TV (Burlington, Vermont) ^ | 06/02/2002 | Andy Potter, Channel 3 news

Posted on 06/04/2002 7:18:53 PM PDT by RonDog

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: Diogenesis
When someone buys maple syrup somewhere else, they should send the Vermont syrup sellers the label with its state of origin highlighted.

Skiers should send their non-Vermont ski lift tickets to the VT resorts.

21 posted on 06/04/2002 8:30:26 PM PDT by jrewingjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
Good ol' Senator Diarrhea-of-the-mouth Leahy? No problem. He ought to be charged with something for opening his mouth too damned much. I'm sure there's some kind of revealing secrets charge someone can come up with or something...
22 posted on 06/04/2002 8:30:29 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
Leahy joked, "I'll tell Attorney General Ashcroft I will speed up the process when he speeds up sending better people."....What a absurd statement..Thank GOD for Tahoe.

That is my email to the paper and C of C.

FReep the Freaks!

23 posted on 06/04/2002 8:38:39 PM PDT by bobbyd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
It's a beautiful state. But as far as I know I'm about the only conservative in town. Or as I'd put it, the only realist.
24 posted on 06/04/2002 8:39:58 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Comment #25 Removed by Moderator

To: jrewingjr
Skiers should send their non-Vermont ski lift tickets to the VT resorts.
LOL! What a GREAT idea!
(And send an electronic copy to the Chamber of Commerce dweebs, too!)


Ski NEW HAMPSHIRE!

26 posted on 06/04/2002 8:48:24 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
I told them that my husband had been planning to return to Burlington for his 30th year reunion at UVM, but was cancelling his plans because of Leahy's obstruction of Bush's judicial nominees.
27 posted on 06/04/2002 9:00:04 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
250 boycott emails is really nothing significant,

Except they tell their friends and they tell their friends....

28 posted on 06/04/2002 9:04:22 PM PDT by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
FReeped and a big bump for a very rainy summer in VT.
29 posted on 06/04/2002 9:14:32 PM PDT by Angelique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva
I told them that my husband had been planning to return to Burlington for his 30th year reunion at UVM, but was cancelling his plans because of Leahy's obstruction of Bush's judicial nominees.
EXCELLENT!!!
We need more messages like THIS one!!!
Way to go, Eva!!!
30 posted on 06/04/2002 9:19:35 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DLfromthedesert
Blue Bunny ice cream is better...and cheaper
31 posted on 06/04/2002 9:31:55 PM PDT by kaktuskid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
... or ski West Virginia! Info at skiwv.com.




We make maple syrup here too, heheh!

32 posted on 06/04/2002 9:38:13 PM PDT by jrewingjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Angelique
FReeped and a big bump for a very rainy summer in VT.
Thank you, Angelique!


from
www.guardian.co.uk

33 posted on 06/04/2002 9:38:22 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
{ aimed at Leahy for blocking conservative judges from appointment to federal courts.} This line is false!! Not just Conservative ANY!! And how about letting some of them come to a vote.
34 posted on 06/04/2002 9:38:35 PM PDT by Brimack34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrewingjr; mountaineer
... or ski West Virginia! Info at skiwv.com.
LOL!
Go, (non-Green) Mountaineers!
A.B.V. = "ANYWHERE but Vermont!"
35 posted on 06/04/2002 9:45:17 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Trajan88
Ben and Jerrys is my one true vice, and now I refuse to have it in my home! It will be hard, but I am not going to buy anything from that state! Emailed everyone I could find to email and told them so.
36 posted on 06/04/2002 9:48:37 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brimack34; JuanAntonio
{ aimed at Leahy for blocking conservative judges from appointment to federal courts.} This line is false!! Not just Conservative ANY!! And how about letting some of them come to a vote.
You got THAT right!

See also, from:

Just Say No to Vermont: Hugh Hewitt says: "Boycott Leahy until Senate votes on judges!"
World Net Daily | May 29, 2002 | Hugh Hewitt
Posted on 5/28/02 11:19 PM Pacific by JuanAntonio
"It is time to cancel that trip to Vermont. Be sure to tell the Vermont Chamber of Commerce why you aren't coming and drop a note to the Burlington Free Press to let the state's leading paper know as well. The Vermont tourism industry can thank Pat Leahy, the father of the mother of all Senate boycotts. Vermonters may learn that what goes around, comes around.

Democrats celebrated the anniversary of Jim Jefford's big bounce last week with a small crowd and some television cameras. Jeffords walked down the steps of the Capitol, was greeted by Tom Daschle, and promptly went off-message.

Jeffords began by greeting his "good friend" Pat Leahy, and asked for a hand for the excitable chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee. A couple of obligatory claps later – Leahy's not a popular guy even in his own caucus – Jeffords got to the heart of the matter: "Pat, I sleep better at night knowing that you are picking the judges."

I played and re-played that tape for my radio audience last week and will do so again this week and for many weeks to come. It is up there with the tape of Paul Wellstone promising to serve only two terms. Wellstone told a lie, but Jeffords told a truth that Dems have been trying to hide.

Pat Leahy is picking federal judges. By himself. He has this unconstitutional power because as chairman of the Judiciary Committee, he has sole power over when to schedule hearings for nominees, and he isn't scheduling them for scores of judges – including eight of President Bush's original 11 nominees, whose names were sent to the Senate 57 weeks ago.

It is rare for accountability to be so clear for legislators and for a particular state. Vermont's Jim Jeffords switched parties, which put Vermont's Pat Leahy in the chairmanship, and Vermont's Pat Leahy is blocking nominees for the two Courts of Appeal which have direct impacts on my life – the Ninth and D.C. Circuits. Leahy's having an impact on your life as well, no matter where you live, because the D.C. Circuit deals with cases from across the country. Leahy is especially bad news for Latinos, as he is playing the race card by blocking Miguel Estrada from the most visible judicial appointment in the history of Latino appointees to the federal courts.

I emphasize again: This is Leahy's doing alone. The chairman has sole control over the scheduling of hearings. The decision to schedule votes after nominees' hearings is also his alone. Once a vote is scheduled, Leahy's power diminishes dramatically. Last week's vote to forward another nominee to the full Senate included yes votes from Sens. Biden and Edwards, even though Leahy had urged a no vote. These two broke with the radical obstructionism of Leahy because they wish to become president, and presidential candidates cannot be part of Leahy's attempt to ideologically cleanse the federal judiciary of all but Leahy-approved nominees.

This is Vermont's blockade, initiated by one Vermonter and executed by another. Though I am no enthusiast for blockades that injure innocent parties, here the culpability is too clear to avoid. Vermont is entitled to its own brand of goof-ball politics. That's the glory of federalism. But the vast, vast majority of Americans support the president and support a diverse and competent judiciary, especially on issues of law and order. They are dismayed by judicial legislators and activist crusaders of the sort that Leahy admires. And there is zero support for a single senator "picking judges." I'd love Gallup to poll that question.

So, I propose that like-minded Americans veto a Vermont vacation until the eight original nominees are given a hearing and a vote by the Judiciary Committee. It is unreasonable to insist they be confirmed – it is not Vermont's doing if a nominee is shot down. But it is Vermont's obstructionism that keeps these eight nominees hostage to Pat Leahy's fevers.

Some callers to my program suggested broader boycotts, but that would diffuse the pressure. Bed and breakfast liberals and ski lodge conservationists may try and pick up the slack, but the tourism industry is widely wired and vocal. Its profitability is also often thin, and tiny ripples can send shock waves. So in addition to the two suggestions above, wander the web in search of a few hotels, bed-and-breakfasts, ski resorts and let fly with a few e-mails explaining that Pat Leahy has begun to figure in your travel plans.

Fairness for eight nominees is not an outrageous demand. Leahy can vote against all eight in fact. Majorities might reject one or all of them.

But unless and until these eight get their hearings and their vote,
just say no to a vacation in Vermont." - Hugh Hewitt


37 posted on 06/04/2002 9:52:38 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Ben and Jerrys is my one true vice, and now I refuse to have it in my home! It will be hard, but I am not going to buy anything from that state! Emailed everyone I could find to email and told them so.
Courage!
After we take back the Senate from these RATS in the fall, we will be able to end the blockade of JUDGES, so we can also end the blockade on VERMONT VACATIONS.

38 posted on 06/04/2002 9:55:50 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
We've got TWO good reasons to boycott Vermont: Leaky Leahy and Benedict Jeffords!
39 posted on 06/04/2002 9:59:12 PM PDT by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
Hell, Bernie Sanders alone is reason to steer clear of the United Socialist State of Vermont.

The home of Jim Jeffords and Patrick Leahy, two of the most dishonorable creatures ever to wear the title of United States Senator.

My first cousin got hooked on Heroin while growing up in Burlington, it is a major problem among youths in Vermonts capital city.

Apparently the ex-hippies on the police force are too stoned to do anything about dope dealing.

What a hell on earth.

40 posted on 06/04/2002 10:00:53 PM PDT by Rome2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson