Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bommer
First of all Rush Blimbloat does not have the ears of 20 million people. His actual line was that in a week he had 20 million listeners with never explaining about 3 to 3.5 million or so of us listened 5 days per week.

There is no way that after the last few months he even has those numbers. Common Tator heard him say that he had lost listeners. You can see from this thread he has and is losing a lot of listeners.

He, Sean and Savage can have a cat fight over the very small body of third party losers. I believe that he has lost a lot of the rest of us.

Rush Blimpbloat is irrelevant to many of us, and I can guarantee you that he will lose a lot more people with this fiasco. I'm sure that on Monday he will try to spin this to say that he saw through the NYSlimes story and did it to change the White House. Yeah sure, Blimbboat.

720 posted on 06/04/2002 3:12:10 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 701 | View Replies ]


To: Grampa Dave
I stopped listening to Rush when he started talking golf, telling us who he knew, met, or had lunch with. (ie, I talked to the White House today) I used to turn him on to listen to politics and his great sense of humor. He lost me a long time ago.
729 posted on 06/04/2002 3:18:21 PM PDT by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 720 | View Replies ]

To: Grampa Dave
I honestly don't know why someone who stands for a basic principle would loose listeners, especially when his only crime is pointing out the hypocracy of Bush. I'm in Texas, I voted for him 3 times, twice as Governor. As Governer, he would states things and make it happen. So far W seems to have turned into our Clinton. Someone who said alot of things to get elected and stabs the base in the back. I'm not blinded by this "Stand by your President in times of war!" Its a Bullsh!t war being used as an excuse to trample on our freedoms. For what you think of Rush, it was only after he showed much distain for this phoney enviormental report (after W's hypocrical stance on not getting natural gas in the Everglades but wanted drilling in the Artic) produced by Christie (what me a liberal?) based on data that the Clinton Administration used that was already discreditied as "junk science", that W decided to dismiss it half heartedly wiht a snide remark. I'm still waiting on him to say "I don't support this report and in no way do I believe it, then retract it from the UN. Think it'll happen?

I don't like the fact that Rush is badmouthing Bush, but he is using the truth to do it. Its all about votes to W now, it seems to me. He has surrendered on every promise he made to his base (with the exception of a tax cut) If this was Clinton, you'd be calling W a lying scumbag. But since he seems to have an air of "credibility" in his down home charisma, anyone who dares critizes Bush is considered a traitor. Sorry but I hold 'W' to the same standands as I held Clinton to. Call it what you will, but at least Rush, as well as myself, aren't going to be blinded by someone who says he's conservative and acts liberal!

1,025 posted on 06/05/2002 3:39:55 AM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 720 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson