| Unlike the hoards of Bush-Bashers who shot from the hip and cried the sky was falling, Nick actually went to the EPA's web site, read the document, and posted the relevent excerpts as well as the final conclusion: the document is nothing but a bureaucratic brush-off using the enviro-nazi's own language against them.
C'mon, people. Just because Clinton is gone, it doesn't mean the press is finished pushing liberal lies down our throats. Don't believe these guys. Check out what they say! Don't just react as if they're telling you the truth... odds are they aren't. Lying is what they do, and always to promote the liberal side of things. If you are new here, please understand something: this is the only place on the Internet where ordinary people have the opportunity to show up these New York liberals as the liars they are. In almost every case, "the truth is out there," and it's probably not more than two good Google searches away. Our mission as Freepers is to find this stuff, and bring it back on a stick, so the rest of the village may enjoy roasting the poor reporter who tried to hoodwink us. The next time some Drudge-assisted liar from the New York Times tries to pull one of these stunts, I hope to see fewer people saying "That does it, I'll never vote for that RINO again" and a lot more people saying, "Look what I found! It says here that..." |
I appreciate the kudos, but what I did used to be standard operating procedure around here. When I got here in '98, a New York Times article with BS in it would survive about five minutes on FR before we had tracked down the source documents and started posting the truth. We would go after a lying reporter like piranhas... a bite here, a bite there, until we had his article in shreds.