[rintense]

There was nothing to agree with him about. It was the constant need to point out that Bush did NOT do a U-Turn that became the fight. It's the bashers that turned it into a feeding frenzy. If people had read the President's remarks from June 2001, and then read the report, they would have known that there was no change in policy. But it was SOOOO much easier to just believe the NYT, Drudge, and Rush than it was to read the facts and make a logical conclusion.

[Registered]

If people had read the President's remarks from June 2001, and then read the report, they would have known that there was no change in policy

But is doesn't matter that the people working for him are doing things he doesn't agree with? Huh?