Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrustow
Good lord whart a bunch of freaks. The NBA has had two rule books since the mid-80s. There's an undocumented but very important penalty in the game: inhibiting the hilight reel of a player with a bigger salary. Been there forever. It's one of the reasons the NBA is a joke. No need for a conspiracy, the Lakers have more stars than the Kings and will get the more favorable calls. All the Vegas-line people know that you add 5 points for every star based just on bogus fouls.

The fact that this series went down to 7, and actually went into overtime in game 7, shows that the empire of the Lakers is ending. Let them have their victory lap. Within the structure of the NBA's rules they've won fair and square.

16 posted on 06/04/2002 7:51:01 AM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: discostu
It used to be that the dual rule book worked the other way. The original philosophy was that it was unfair for players like Chamberlin and Jabbar to be able to score literally at will, anywhere, anytime. So great latitude was permitted their defenders.

As a result, anyone was allowed to foul Jabbar anytime and the foul was rarely called. In fact, it always seemed to me that the league encouraged double-team fouls where both defenders were hacking hard at Jabbar simultaneously. This was true thru his entire career.

At some point that did change for the new generation of stars. I think the league figured out that having stars with spectacular highlight reels sold tickets. The other thing that changed was the complete abandonment of the traveling rule on stars. Enforcement of just that rule on Jordan would have changed Jordan's career significantly. And some of his best highlights were extreme violations of traveling.

Jabbar never benefitted from the change. Even as an old man, it took two defenders constantly hacking at him to keep him from scoring 30-40 points a game. Without taking anything away from Johnson, Worthy and other Laker stars of that era, much of their success came from the fact that it took two defenders with freedom to hack to contain Jabbar. Playing him one on one was just not an option if you wanted to win. So the rest of the Lakers were playing 4 on 3 most of the time.

177 posted on 06/04/2002 10:41:47 AM PDT by ffrancone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson