To: Howlin
I've yet to meet a liberal who's realistic about anything. As I said, I just find it somewhat disturbing that you would posit a theory that Limbaugh and Hannity are engaged in an orchestrated smear campaign against Bush simply because they criticized him. It's the same way fellow freepers who criticize Bush administration policies are attacked.
347 posted on
06/03/2002 12:55:25 PM PDT by
garv
To: garv
I just find it somewhat disturbing that you would posit a theory that Limbaugh and Hannity are engaged in an orchestrated smear campaign against Bush simply because they criticized him.
They are if they are repeating an inaccurate article from the NYT aren't they?
To: garv
Look, the New York Times misrepresented the report, but STILL pointed out that there was NO CHANGE IN POLICY by the Administration. Anyone who says there WAS a change in policy has either not read the article, or is overlooking this to get a few digs in, IMHO.
353 posted on
06/03/2002 12:58:10 PM PDT by
hchutch
To: garv
You obviously missed the big point: why are all these "reports" coming out now? Why did the FBI woman wait until May to write her memo if she KNEW about it on 9-11?
Why, in the face of the FACT, that the NYT is LYING about this report, are Sean and Rush not only "falling for it," but perpetutating the lie? It seems like to me, you'd be asking THEM that.
358 posted on
06/03/2002 1:00:14 PM PDT by
Howlin
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson