Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
I've yet to meet a liberal who's realistic about anything. As I said, I just find it somewhat disturbing that you would posit a theory that Limbaugh and Hannity are engaged in an orchestrated smear campaign against Bush simply because they criticized him. It's the same way fellow freepers who criticize Bush administration policies are attacked.
347 posted on 06/03/2002 12:55:25 PM PDT by garv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies ]


To: garv
I just find it somewhat disturbing that you would posit a theory that Limbaugh and Hannity are engaged in an orchestrated smear campaign against Bush simply because they criticized him.

They are if they are repeating an inaccurate article from the NYT aren't they?

350 posted on 06/03/2002 12:56:56 PM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]

To: garv
Look, the New York Times misrepresented the report, but STILL pointed out that there was NO CHANGE IN POLICY by the Administration. Anyone who says there WAS a change in policy has either not read the article, or is overlooking this to get a few digs in, IMHO.
353 posted on 06/03/2002 12:58:10 PM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]

To: garv
You obviously missed the big point: why are all these "reports" coming out now? Why did the FBI woman wait until May to write her memo if she KNEW about it on 9-11?

Why, in the face of the FACT, that the NYT is LYING about this report, are Sean and Rush not only "falling for it," but perpetutating the lie? It seems like to me, you'd be asking THEM that.

358 posted on 06/03/2002 1:00:14 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson