Why, in the face of the FACT, that the NYT is LYING about this report, are Sean and Rush not only "falling for it," but perpetutating the lie? It seems like to me, you'd be asking THEM that.
Both Sean and Rush understand all the facts and they are not lying. The problem with the report isn't that there isn't plenty of skepticism about globull warming in it, which there is, the problem is there are many damaging statements that seem to concede the lies of the globull alarmists. These are the kinds of things that shift the debate to favor the left. They are admitting there is a problem when in fact there isn't, this fuels the fire for the government to do something about it.