Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIMBAUGH RIPS BUSH WHITE HOUSE OVER GLOBAL WARMING 'FLIP-FLOP'
Drudge Report ^ | 6/3/02 | Matt Drudge

Posted on 06/03/2002 10:04:46 AM PDT by hchutch

Just the headline


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; drudge; limbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,341-1,348 next last
To: jwalsh07
Did Bush sign Kyoto?

With Bush's cave to the environmental whackos it looks like he will be doing Kyoto piece by piece over the new few years.

661 posted on 06/03/2002 6:16:25 PM PDT by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Did Bush sign Kyoto?

With Bush's cave to the environmental whackos it looks like he will be doing Kyoto piece by piece over the next few years.

662 posted on 06/03/2002 6:16:47 PM PDT by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 649 | View Replies]

Comment #663 Removed by Moderator

To: christine11
Interesting post, but have you forgotten ONE bigger issue that makes what you'd like seen done right now irrelevant.....WAR??? It's this and this alone that occupies him and War will make or break his Presidency.Can you truly say, Chris, that those things that animate you are as important as winning a War??
664 posted on 06/03/2002 6:18:46 PM PDT by habs4ever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 657 | View Replies]

To: floriduh voter
I don't know how any of you could still be supporting Bush like this. He's done more for the left in 2 years than even Gore could have done!
You folks remind me of the Democrats who are still petitioning to get Clinton re-elected because he was "such a good president."
You people should be furious over the stuff he's pulled! He's sold us out every time.
Now that he's publically said the lie about global warming is real ( it's just a cycle that will pass) , he will again suck up to the left.
His father preached the goal was the one world order constantly. He's just like his father. Open your eyes!
665 posted on 06/03/2002 6:18:46 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 650 | View Replies]

To: WRhine
With Bush's cave to the environmental whackos it looks like he will be doing Kyoto piece by piece over the next few years.

Bush has proposed a logical and restrained policy toward the study of global warming. He has refused to become involved in Kyoto because it harms America. He kills terrorists because they harm America.

My kind of guy.

666 posted on 06/03/2002 6:19:00 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
"When Rush lost his hearing, apparently his mind went with it. I heard him today, though I vowed I would give him up, and from what I heard, I would call him certifiably insane."

Well said...and, me too.

667 posted on 06/03/2002 6:19:28 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 655 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics
His father preached the goal was the one world order constantly. He's just like his father. Open your eyes!

Demonstrable bs. One raised taxes, the other cut them.

668 posted on 06/03/2002 6:20:46 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 665 | View Replies]

To: Maxpowers
Oh, please. That is not only an unfair characterization...it's also silly.
669 posted on 06/03/2002 6:21:11 PM PDT by Right_in_Virginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]

To: deport; MJY1288; Grampa Dave; Miss marple; Howlin; DrDeb; ohioWfan
Thank you for posting this, deport!
670 posted on 06/03/2002 6:21:39 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 647 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
"Bush has proposed a logical and restrained policy toward the study of global warming. He has refused to become involved in Kyoto because it harms America. He kills terrorists because they harm America.

My kind of guy"

My vote for quote of the day

671 posted on 06/03/2002 6:22:12 PM PDT by MJY1288
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
Bush didn't buy the CFR and you know it. He chose to sign it and let the Supreme Court make the final kill. He's smart enough to know how to deal with McCain Democrats once and for all. Too bad you aren't.

Lying doesn't improve your arguments.

"Woe indeed."

672 posted on 06/03/2002 6:22:13 PM PDT by Deb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
Rush is now the embodiment of Hate Radio-it's all hate for George Bush, all the time. I do not believe that the person behind the EIB microphone is a conservative-at one time, he was, but not now. He's a bitter,angry quasi Libertarian. He's running neck and neck with John McCain, as the most despised ex Republican.
673 posted on 06/03/2002 6:22:22 PM PDT by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 653 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07; cmsgop

Yeah, it's fine here.. hope you are doing well also Mr. JWalsh.

674 posted on 06/03/2002 6:22:31 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 660 | View Replies]

To: Maxpowers

THE SEGWAY: THE NEW GOP LOGO

675 posted on 06/03/2002 6:23:42 PM PDT by Jethro Tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 663 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Bush has proposed a logical and restrained policy toward the study of global warming.

Read my lips...he also said he would reduce government spending. He said he would reduce the size of government. Now he's setting up the one world order his dad always wanted. No wonder his poll numbers say the democrats love him. Why wouldn't they?

676 posted on 06/03/2002 6:23:50 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies]

To: hchutch, fightinJAG, truthkeeper, Bommer, Dales, galt-jw, Tuor, Mudboy Slim, Sci Fi Guy, Redcloak
A friend alerted me to this thread via FReepmail. I've tried to skim many of the 600+ replies here (whew!), so I figure I've earned the right to respond to a few of them. :)

One poster accused Rush of losing whatever skill he had at understanding the political zeitgeist and the political context.... and....never having anything uplifting to say, just whining all the time.

It's about time we all started whining (and preferably loudly and long), because those who hold the federal (executive, legislative, and judicial) reins in this country are not listening to those of us who know what their power is supposed to entail (and where it should end). Not only are they not performing that relatively small list of services which they are called to do, but they are, instead, doing all manner of things which they are forbidden to do by the very document which serves as their blueprint.

I stopped listening to Rush many months ago, so am not really familiar with his latest pet peeves, favorite sports stories, cigar recommendations, or causes du jour. But, from the sounds of it, I may have to begin listening to him again (or at least begin re-testing the E.I.B waters).

As for Mr. Limbaugh losing whatever skill he had at understanding the political zeitgeist and the political context....There's entirely too much political everything being considered these days (zeitgeist and context notwithstanding). It's time to put political considerations aside and start focusing on two concepts....and two concepts only: (1) reclaiming a consitutional republic form of government, and (2) survival.

No more sitting back and stroking one's figurative beard and deciding what the (so-called) civilized thing to do is. America is concerning herself with (so-called) civilized behavior moreso than she is with her own, and the free world's, survival.

Iraq, Iran, Syria, Libya, Egypt, North Korea, Saudi Arabia....political correctness, concern for world opinion, the practice of global civility (and maybe even the valuing of human life and liberty) are not a part of their lexicon. So, at least during these most perilous times, neither can they (other than the life and liberty thing) be a part of ours.

This country is desperately in need of Reagan-esque leadership (the kind that places America first, and governs based on right rather than politically correct, or politically expedient, decision making). Such leadership is not forthcoming from G. W. Bush.

The man is seeking a negotiated peace with people who believe their destiny is to kill those who do not share their religious (*cough*) views, and who will not stop the killing until their neighbor state (who merely wants to be left alone) is eradicated.

The man is preaching conservative governance, and then supporting or signing every unconstitutional/pork-laden/liberty-destroying/dollar-hungry bill that is brought to his attention or laid upon his desk. Not one veto since taking office a year and a half ago. Not one.

All one needs to do is take a good look at Bush's stance on the (either already signed by him into law, or pending) education bill....farm bill....partiot act....homeland security....campaign finance reform....immigration.... federalization of airport security....healthcare entitlements....Hardly anything contained in any of them that promotes government the likes of which the founders envisioned. And lots of big-government spending and regulating which will result in increased federal power over the states and individual citizens, the greatest increase in federal government spending in history, and more incremental loss of God-given, constitutionally-insured liberties for all of us.

I'm not (nor are most of the other 'whiners' on this thread) a Bush hater. I voted for him, and will again, if he once again represents the lesser of two evils. Those on this thread who are using that term fail to see the difference between hating a man and voicing the fact that you are being betrayed by him.

My friend (he who alerted me to this thread :) calls Bush's political philosophy of governance 'stealth conservatism' --- it's there, but you can't see it, touch it, taste it, nor feel it. I think he's got it nailed.

677 posted on 06/03/2002 6:24:14 PM PDT by joanie-f
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cmsgop

I came back cause I missed you..

It only took so long because I was holding out for the Richard Simmons "perky" search team.

(hope you are well CMS)

:)

678 posted on 06/03/2002 6:25:15 PM PDT by Jhoffa_
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
Demonstrable bs. One raised taxes, the other cut them.

Oh yes. He let us buy that new muffler. Praise Bush - NOT!

679 posted on 06/03/2002 6:25:29 PM PDT by concerned about politics
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 668 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
Most of us feel that President Bush is telling us the truth.

I am guessing you speak for yourself or primarily bushbots in general on this issue. I would agree that bush is light years ahead of you know who...

But consider: if he signed cfr that he did not supposedly agree with... and signed off on issuing this report, that he does not agree with... and tells Israel to "get out now" when he really means "go to it IDF..." then he is developing a really nasty habit of authenticating what he believes or knows to lies and distortion. That is NOT a good thing. Though at times it may be necessary, I suppose.

We had that in a president last time. I had hoped we had put it behind us for good. I did not want any more clintonizing of reality for political purposes. I thought this election we were getting the guy who said.. "I am comfortable in my OWN skin... I don't have to check which way the wind blows to see who I am every day..." and such.

If he is authenticating lies and positions he disagrees with, he is certainly doing what he said he would not. If he agrees with these laws (CFR) and actually supports the findings of these reports (EPA), we are even worse off than if he is lying. Our leader should not be basing his national policy decisions on lies and deceptions.

I lean towards his being politically disingenuous. Seems like the disingenuous "read my lips" and "no new taxes" syndrome is creeping up on him pretty severely right now.

That is not to mention the "for us or against us" invitations to the murderers ("we will make no distinction between terrorists and the nations that support them") of 9-11 fame, the saudi leadership, to crawford for barbeque!

You may not like extreme right wing folks, but bush could never have gotten elected without US. He HAS been a sellout recently dave. He can do better and he should.

I AM disappointed.

I am further disappointed in the number of Freepers who are not. What's it gonna take? Another skyscraper or worse?

680 posted on 06/03/2002 6:26:01 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 643 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 641-660661-680681-700 ... 1,341-1,348 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson