Posted on 06/03/2002 8:54:23 AM PDT by Texaggie79
Like I said, I don't want to get banned...
I've visited it a number of times, usually because I was referred there by a link from somewhere else. I found many of their articles about limited government right on, but didn't care for the occassional Abe Lincoln /the South was right stuff that seems popular with a certain element over there. I tend to be more of a Ron Paul kind of guy.
I happen to have alot of respect for Sobran. I don't care much for the Likudnics in the current Israeli government, nor do I think it in American interests to support them in their orgy of theocratic nationalism. Just leave us (and our money) out of that intractable mess.Crackpot theology makes bad foreign policy
Very well; I have no respect for you, then.
Really? Then why the rant about rolling with the times? By bashing paleos and affirming your neo-con status, you are aligning yourself with the modern "conservatives" of the Republican Party, and it is sickeningly clear that the GOP has adopted a "living, breathing document" view of the Constitution. How else can you explain the steps the current administration has taken? The Patriot Act. The federalization of airport security. Refusing to arm pilots. Billions of dollars more in education spending. Billions more in farm subsidies. Amnesty for illegal aliens. Are these examples of your precious new conservatism? If so, count me out.
"Rockwell, Sobran, DiLorenzo, I spit on all of them.....The others can go to hell."
Fortunately, your spit is no more vile or offensive than the bilge spewed from the mouths of Washington politicians. You also lack the authority to condemn me or others like me to hell. So, as long as I can exercise my freedom of speech to offend "conservatives" such as yourself, I'll be happy.....at least until the neo-cons figure out some way of by-passing the First Amendment.
The largest funding source is one Burton Blumert, a non-Zionist Jew, BTW.
I'm not quite as isolationist as some in that camp, but the neocons appear to think it is our government's duty to meddle in every conflict there is in the world. There's no doubt we needed to go after Bin Laden, but we're going to go bankrupt financing every ill-advised military intervention that the neocons and their democratic sisters dream up. What ever happened to the 'peace dividend' we were promised after we defeated the Soviet Union? This war without end that some in the Bush administration keep pushing is a little too Orwellian for my tastes.
Your bias also shows, when you address foreign affairs. Consider this line:
I get a kick out of The Nazis were Socialists headline--as if that is the worst thing you can call those who gave us the Holocaust (and WWII).
Of course the point is that the Nazis whole approach to European politics reflected their socialist roots. Their targeting of German Jews, as the scapegoat on their path to power, as an obvious example, was taken directly from Karl Marx and other 19th Century German Socialists. (See The Cult Of "The Holocaust"--Golden Calf Of The Twentieth Century.) As for their starting World War II, that was simply their version of the endemic Socialist pursuit of international power. It was only launched after they entered into a temporary alliance with Bolshevik Russia.
Socialist values, methodology and compulsions, provided the Nazis with their whole reason for existence. If you fail to understand that, you have missed the forest of the 1930s for the trees that the Left would rather you focus on.
William Flax Return Of The Gods Web Site
Well, there's Burt Blumert; he is listed in the article that you posted.
"In 1983 Rudy was appointed US Attorney for the Southern District of New York. His record 4,152 convictions with a mere 25 reversals is a testament to his zeal for the job."
"Giuliani did not accumulate this glittering record on behalf of the citizens of the Southern District. He was motivated purely by political ambition."
"As a prosecutor he employed ruthless tactics such as seizing prominent stockbrokers and traders from the floor of the exchanges and dragging them away in handcuffs with the television cameras already in place and rolling."
"In his most famous case, against stock market innovator Michael Milken of Drexel Burnham, Giuliani used the threat of the Racketeering-Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) statutes – which were so draconian that Milken had no choice but to make a deal with the federal government".
Another tyranical practice that Guiliani instituted in New York was the confiscation of automobiles of people - not convicted, of drunk driving. It's true that the dice are heavily loaded against a person who has been arrested for drunk driving, but for the sake of appearance, at least, the automobile shouldn't be confiscated before the conviction.
[rdb3] You are a flat-out liar. Show me one neo who believes this. Just one!
Liberals believe in using the coercive power of the federal government to advance the liberal agenda. Neocons believe in using the coercive power of the federal government to advance the neocon agenda. Kristol's philosophy of "national greatness conservatism" should be sufficient to demonstrate this.
If the Constitution happens to agree with a particular agenda item, call it serendipity.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.