Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JerseyHighlander
...it does not propose any major shift in the administration's policy on greenhouse gases.

I wonder how many times this will get over looked.

3 posted on 06/02/2002 7:52:49 PM PDT by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Miss Marple
fyi.......
4 posted on 06/02/2002 7:55:15 PM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rintense
From the Bush-hating chorus:

FACTS....FACTS.....WE DON'T NEED NO STINKING FACTS!

5 posted on 06/02/2002 7:55:36 PM PDT by Pokey78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rintense
Of course, teh media (and Democrats) will say: "You are expressing dire predictions and won't do anything about it?" The EPA better have explanations already for this one.
13 posted on 06/02/2002 8:08:29 PM PDT by rwfromkansas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rintense; deport
...it does not propose any major shift in the administration's policy on greenhouse gases.

What kind of changes would be considered a non-major shift, and where would that kind of shift put us in respect to global warming accords? Yes, I saw your post, deport. Sorry to be so cynical, but I've seen such statements before and watched something rather different happen.

I'd be happy to believe otherwise, that the libs are running this to slice support from Bush's base. But to tell you the truth, I haven't seen one ounce of government weight reduction, not one rescinsion of Bubba's most intrusive and frightening EO's, no indication of reigning in the insane drug war, any reduction of expensive, intrusive and offensive executive agencies, or any redirection of executive efforts away from the status quo of a rapidly developing socialist forces. I do see a very disturbing event, the redefining of federal policy toward citizens and firearms, the effect of which may just be the strategy to keep Emerson out of the SC.

30 posted on 06/02/2002 8:35:41 PM PDT by William Terrell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rintense
This link may be old and irrelevant or it may be current and already posted. But it appears to be the Bush administrations plan to limit global warming. Thank God Christy Todd Whitman is in charge of EPA and that the era of "big government" is over. Finally the Republicans are in control and we no longer have to worry about government mucking up our lives.

Click here for a different approach.

85 posted on 06/03/2002 4:03:41 AM PDT by B. A. Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: rintense
it does not propose any major shift in the administration's policy on greenhouse gases.

The policy of the bush administration is that human induced global warming is a fact.

I wonder how many times this will get over looked.

Not by me. Human caused global warming is a flat out lie invented by the eco-freak/watermelon NGO's and fostered by the UN as a scheme to redistribute wealth globally.

If bush had a pair he would tell the UN and it's minions to shove Agenda 21 and the "framework" climate change treaty.

Instead, he will take the mushy middle approach and give the NGO's/UN part of what they want at the expense of all Americans to buy a few soccer mom votes.

Regards

J.R.

88 posted on 06/03/2002 5:05:57 AM PDT by NMC EXP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: lazamataz
Just wondering how many times in a row you're going to fall for drivel from Drudge.

You were claiming last week that Bush had "reversed" his global warming position, yes...

151 posted on 06/03/2002 3:54:41 PM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson