Bush Extremely Strong With Base (06/01/2002)

ap via newsday ^ | 5/31/2002 | Will Lester

[WRhine]

Well, I see you are proud of yourself. In other words, you are PROUD that you helped contribute to the danger we are in now. You will be HAPPY if you can teach us a lesson by getting rid of Bush by withholding your vote. So what if we get Gore, or Hillary, because by golly, you will have taught us!!

In case you haven't caught my drift, I don't see much difference between a Liberal open borders Bush or a Liberal open borders Gore or Hillary. Chose your poison. With Bush the road the ruin is slower. So What? Perhaps this country needs another shock for the Sheeple to wake up from their slumber. I know the RNC certainly needs some shaking up.

[Texasforever]

LOL.

[deport]

So, tell me, how are you going to feel when two guys have sex in front of your kids at the library?

YUCK.......... couldn't you have thought of a better scene?

[Howlin]

Hasn't seemed to work in the past.

Some people just cannot stand to see success.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

Translation???????? No specken de gobbledy-gook.

[concerned about politics]

And just who would that be?

I guess we'll just have to sit it out until we find one. No big deal.

[A Citizen Reporter]

"especially if he starts losing some of them."

Can you read? Read above posted article, and comment intelligently on the premise. We have all been waiting for a refutation of the data, instead it's vitriol.......it's VERY telling!

[Amelia]

"If you got seventy-five or eighty percent of what you were asking for, I say, you take it and fight for the rest later, and that's what I told these radical conservatives who never got used to it."
Ronald Reagan

Good reminder, Texasforever!

[Howlin]

You want me to "dress it up?" Make it easier to ...ah.....take? No way.

[PhiKapMom]

You are my hero for posting this Ronald Reagan quote!

[Howlin]

I'd like an answer to my question to you about the library.

[rintense]

(In her best bot-voice) Take me to your leader...

[WIMom]

I don't always agree with what has happened, but I support the overall effectiveness of what he has accomplished to date. Texasforever wrote a good summary. I asked if I could use it, and was given the green light.

[Sabertooth]

In my opinion, the 92 campaign was lost because of Pat Buchanan's attack, Ross Perot's candidacy, and the media drumbeat on the economy.

Whose mistakes gave Pat and Ross the openings?

When a politician loses votes that were once his, he as screwed up.

Saddam was let off the hook because we were operating under a UN mandate to kick him out of Kuwait, NOT go into Baghdad and kill him. You must also remember that at that time the Soviet Union was still fairly powerful militarily and sat right on Iraq's northern border, fairly close to Baghdad.

Yeah, there's all kinds of plausible stuff, and I don't look at the decision not to do the right thing with Saddam as I do Clinton giving away secrets to the Chinese.

But winning righteous wars and grinding enemies into the dirt is a policy successfully employed by the US in the past, and that very success would have solved a lot of the geopolitical concerns.

Instead, we got the Arafat Peace Prize and a bludgeoned Israel... and Saddam with many of the WMDs we were glad he didn't have in '91.

[Southflanknorthpawsis]

Bush isn't going to win reelection merely by appealing to his original base, especially if he starts losing some of them.

You look like you could use some help. Scroll to the top and read.

Here's a starter highlight for you.

"Bush wins overwhelming majority support from all Republicans and with strong Republicans it is all but unanimous," said Thomas Riehle, president of Ipsos-Reid public affairs, which conducts a tracking poll for the Cook Political Report.

Go ahead. Dare to peek.

[concerned about politics]

I'd like an answer to my question to you about the library.

what library?

[Torie]

Well it probably isn't Kristol, nor Kargan, nor Krugman, nor Kerry, so who does that leave?

[Howlin]

Here's another one:

To: Tumbleweed_Connection

This means we must begin winning over voters in the mushy middle and winning over fringe party voters on the right. I did not see a single Libertarian Party, Constitution Party, Natural Law Party, or Taxpayer Party member vote for Judge Pickering today. I did see nine Republicans vote for him and ten Democrats vote against him.

8 posted on 3/15/02 2:55 PM Eastern by afuturegovernor

[Texasforever]

I have a strong feeling the initials are AK

[WRhine]

So you are another one with all the problems and no solutions. I guess it is really fun just to snipe from the cheap seats. BTW the terms "Bushbot", "Bush loyaltast", "Card carrying RNC types" epithets bounce right off my hard head.

Yeah I have a lot of nerve to express my grievances with this republican president on FR. Better to stick the the WH talking points and not question anything Bush does.