Posted on 06/01/2002 6:23:27 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:35 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]
WASHINGTON -- Occasional grumbling by some prominent conservatives about President Bush sometimes overshadows his extremely solid support among stalwart Republicans and conservatives around the country.
Many Republicans and Democrats seem to agree that support by itself does not tilt the 2002 elections toward the GOP. Some, however, say it could offset the gains the party out of the White House -- Democrats, in this case -- historically has made in midterm elections.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsday.com ...
In case you haven't caught my drift, I don't see much difference between a Liberal open borders Bush or a Liberal open borders Gore or Hillary. Chose your poison. With Bush the road the ruin is slower. So What? Perhaps this country needs another shock for the Sheeple to wake up from their slumber. I know the RNC certainly needs some shaking up.
YUCK.......... couldn't you have thought of a better scene?
Some people just cannot stand to see success.
I guess we'll just have to sit it out until we find one. No big deal.
Can you read? Read above posted article, and comment intelligently on the premise. We have all been waiting for a refutation of the data, instead it's vitriol.......it's VERY telling!
Good reminder, Texasforever!
Whose mistakes gave Pat and Ross the openings?
When a politician loses votes that were once his, he as screwed up.
Saddam was let off the hook because we were operating under a UN mandate to kick him out of Kuwait, NOT go into Baghdad and kill him. You must also remember that at that time the Soviet Union was still fairly powerful militarily and sat right on Iraq's northern border, fairly close to Baghdad.
Yeah, there's all kinds of plausible stuff, and I don't look at the decision not to do the right thing with Saddam as I do Clinton giving away secrets to the Chinese.
But winning righteous wars and grinding enemies into the dirt is a policy successfully employed by the US in the past, and that very success would have solved a lot of the geopolitical concerns.
Instead, we got the Arafat Peace Prize and a bludgeoned Israel... and Saddam with many of the WMDs we were glad he didn't have in '91.
You look like you could use some help. Scroll to the top and read.
Here's a starter highlight for you.
"Bush wins overwhelming majority support from all Republicans and with strong Republicans it is all but unanimous," said Thomas Riehle, president of Ipsos-Reid public affairs, which conducts a tracking poll for the Cook Political Report.
Go ahead. Dare to peek.
what library?
To: Tumbleweed_Connection
This means we must begin winning over voters in the mushy middle and winning over fringe party voters on the right. I did not see a single Libertarian Party, Constitution Party, Natural Law Party, or Taxpayer Party member vote for Judge Pickering today. I did see nine Republicans vote for him and ten Democrats vote against him.
8 posted on 3/15/02 2:55 PM Eastern by afuturegovernor
Yeah I have a lot of nerve to express my grievances with this republican president on FR. Better to stick the the WH talking points and not question anything Bush does.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.