Skip to comments.
Bush Extremely Strong With Base (06/01/2002)
ap via newsday ^
| 5/31/2002
| Will Lester
Posted on 06/01/2002 6:23:27 PM PDT by TLBSHOW
Edited on 09/03/2002 4:50:35 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 641-650 next last
To: concerned about politics
You send out mass e-mails? Do you know how worthless that is in influencing people? Personally, I throw out all mass e-mails without reading them, no matter who sends them. Unlike you, I'm not waiting for Godoh (sp?) I also am not waiting for government to do anything for my church. If you are, perhaps its better that you never vote again.
141
posted on
06/01/2002 8:40:25 PM PDT
by
jimtorr
To: concerned about politics
I'm not passive at all. I send out mass e-mails for the religious right.So you send massive amount of unsolicited junk mail. I'm sure those on the receiving end appreciate that.
To: TLBSHOW
Moderator seem to have been busy on this one.
I say Bush is doing a good enough job. Bump.
To: Sabertooth
I think if Bush had vetoed CFR and made a strong public case about why he did so, he'd have beaten override (did it even pass with 67 votes?). And that's as good as a win, so that makes him more difficult to oppose on a war in Iraq, not less. It is a win only for his term in office. The veto power is not absolute. The only way to actually kill it is to have it found unconstitutional.
To: concerned about politics
I always read all my e-mails from people I don't know. Not! I get 50 e-mails a day from people I don't know and I never even open one of them. They get mass deleted as fast as I get them. Seriously, if you believe in what you state, get off your behind and do something productive. Mass e-mails are not going to get the results you hope for.
BTW, be prepared to turn in your keyboard. If you don't vote, you don't get to complain.
145
posted on
06/01/2002 8:42:57 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: deport
A republican doesn't control the Senate.... see what I mean Vern?...... takes a few more to tango as the Executive isn't the only branch of gov't..... I said we weren't voting, period. For no one - unless it's worth the gas money to get there. :-)
If Bush wins again, good for you guys. If not, that's too bad.
If the right gets the Seanate, good. That would be nice. I hope it all works out for you folks.
If a person doesn't stand for something, they stand for nothing at all. I stand for the moral fabric and the rights that support it. Without the moral fabric, the Constitution will not stand either. It will depend on the the meaning of the word "is". After all, there "is" no "wrong" without an absolute.
To: concerned about politics
Your lack of knowledge of the Constitution is amazing! Where in the Constitution does it say Separation of Church of State? Here is Thomas Jefforson's comment:
In 1802, President Jefferson wrote a letter to a group of Baptists in Danbury, Connecticut, in ...... a letter to a group of Baptists in Danbury, Connecticut, in which he declared that it was the purpose of the First Amendment to build ''a wall of separation between Church and State.'' 15 In Reynolds v. United States, 16 Chief Justice Waite for the Court characterized the phrase as ''almost an authoritative ... (End of Quote)
Now since this goes back to the First Amendment which does not say Separation of Church in State, how in the world do you think that President Bush could change this when it doesn't say it to begin with?
Here is the First Amendment to the Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
To: terilyn
If you don't vote, you don't get to complain.I like your new rule!
Maybe you can use this to enforce it:
148
posted on
06/01/2002 8:45:22 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: concerned about politics
If a person doesn't stand for something, they stand for nothing at all. I stand for the moral fabric and the rights that support it. Without the moral fabric, the Constitution will not stand either. It will depend on the the meaning of the word "is". After all, there "is" no "wrong" without an absolute. I have to be honest with you. You are going to contribute to your own demise with that attitude. I shudder to think that there are enough like you to make a difference.
To: WRhine
Oh yeah, sure. Got Me. After 4 years on FR you are the first to unmask me. Who would you like to see as POTUS and why?
To: Howlin
Damn, I was downstairs cleaning my FAL, did I miss something?
Looks like the MP's or SP's were here.
A little broken glass, a busted chair, but the home team is still standing. Not bad.
151
posted on
06/01/2002 8:47:11 PM PDT
by
tet68
To: Miss Marple
Thumbs up on post #136. It is as correct as correct gets, IMO.
To: concerned about politics
I said we weren't voting, period. For no one - unless it's worth the gas money to get there. :-) If Bush wins again, good for you guys. If not, that's too bad. If the right gets the Seanate, good. That would be nice. I hope it all works out for you folks.I'm begging you now -- no joking -- SWEAR to me you won't go anywhere NEAR a voting booth until I die.
If a person doesn't stand for something, they stand for nothing at all. I stand for the moral fabric and the rights that support it.
Why do I have a visual of you lying in bed, posting?
153
posted on
06/01/2002 8:47:32 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Howlin
LOL! Think it would wake some of them up?
154
posted on
06/01/2002 8:47:55 PM PDT
by
terilyn
To: Miss Marple
DO NOT EVER BRAG TO ME ABOUT THAT AGAIN!!!! When a republican president not only refuses to protect America's sovereignty as a nation but also undermines it with Amnesties for Illegals, I don't see much difference between him and the prior criminal. Oh and per above....
"I guess memories really are short in politics. 1992 seems like a forgotten lesson of what happens to RINOs when they burn their conservative base repeatedly. GUESS WHAT? We Stay Home On Election Day".
155
posted on
06/01/2002 8:49:09 PM PDT
by
WRhine
Comment #156 Removed by Moderator
To: WRhine
GUESS WHAT? There aren't as many of "you" as you think there are -- and we are SO happy about it. Nobody gives a crap about a voter who threatens to withhold his vote if he doesn't get what he wants.
157
posted on
06/01/2002 8:51:36 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: WRhine
I guess memories really are short in politics. 1992 seems like a forgotten lesson of what happens to RINOs when they burn their conservative base repeatedly. GUESS WHAT? We Stay Home On Election Day". WHO SHOULD BE THE NEXT POTUS?
To: WRhine
If in November you can vote and don't to prove your point of being a democrat helper. Then you are unmasked because you are playing right into the hands of the DNC Plan.
159
posted on
06/01/2002 8:52:19 PM PDT
by
TLBSHOW
To: Howlin
You still haven't explained why you can't pray when you want to. No group prayer on public grounds. "When two or more of you come together, that's where I'll be."
Christians are told to gather together often, and pray at anytime, but the "law" that oppresses our right to do so could get us arrested.
All other religions are embraced and taught as politically correct, but just try Christianity on public funded property!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140, 141-160, 161-180 ... 641-650 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson