Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GeneD
omigod. This appeared in the New York Times, the paper that was probably one of the leaders in PC and one of the parties responsible for the Bowdlerization of the universe?

Actually, reading the NYT over the last few months, the only positive thing I can say about Sept. 11 is that it prompted the NYT to reexamine some of its knee-jerk liberal attitudes. The Times has done some incredible reporting on 9/11, more than deserving of a Pulitzer, and I have detected large gusts of common sense blowing through areas that had been, up to now, seriously air-conditioned against them.

21 posted on 06/01/2002 5:58:45 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: livius
Actually, reading the NYT over the last few months, the only positive thing I can say
about Sept. 11 is that it prompted the NYT to reexamine some of its knee-jerk liberal attitudes.


I detect a bit of the same.
But, like the fall of the Berlin Wall and the breakup of the USSR...I remain skeptical.

Personally I maintain the same policy for East Coast Liberal Insanity that Reagan
had for The Evil Empire: Trust, But Verify.

And if there ever is a President Hillary Rodham Clinton, I will know New York
had a brief episode of lucidity, then fell back to it's normal stage of left-wing insanity.
29 posted on 06/01/2002 6:16:23 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson