[bannie]

...and yet we pay for welfare mothers to breed for bucks... Can't we pay for a soldier's spouse who discovers herself in the painful position of carrying a child to term which has no way of possibly surviving more than a couple of days...and will have NO "LIFE" for those minutes here. Should she be expected to hold the child to term--as a constant and painful reminder of that which she has already lost?

I vote for my taxes to help the SOLDIER's WIFE out of a horrible position.

(I am aware of the "past-tense-ness" of this...but the precidence is current.)

[CindyDawg]

Just MHO but i feel that every child has a place in this world and that there are no accidents. (even little ones on welfare). My husband and I were both raised in projects. We put each other thru school and are now both nurses. Lots of welfare babies become the tax payers you are talking about. If you want to decrease welfare look at getting Dads out of prisons and forcing them to be responsible for taking care of their families.

[Gee Wally]

Can't we pay for a soldier's spouse who discovers herself in the painful position of carrying a child to term which has no way of possibly surviving more than a couple of days...and will have NO "LIFE" for those minutes here.

That's not for judges to decide, it's for the legislature. Tell Congress to change the law. Lobby, buy off your Congress critter or whatever. I think that's the way it's done in a FREE REPUBLIC.

Is this still a "conservative" forum or am I lost?