Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Agent: FBI Could Have Prevented 9-11
Newsmax.com ^ | May 31, 2002 | Wes Vernon

Posted on 05/30/2002 8:36:48 PM PDT by tgslTakoma

WASHINGTON – A veteran FBI agent Thursday charged that corruption inside the bureau derailed investigations that could have averted the terrorist attacks on America on Sept. 11. His lawyers said the FBI had evidence that the World Trade Center was a possible terrorist target. In a memo written 91 days before Sept. 11, the man, Special Agent Robert G. Wright Jr., warned that Americans would die as a result of the FBI's failure to investigate terrorists living in this country.

Wright went public at a press conference even though FBI Director Robert Mueller ordered him to stay in Chicago and threatened him with criminal prosecution if he spoke publicly about the agency's wrongdoing.

"The FBI is not protecting the American people,” declared Wright at a conference sponsored by his attorneys at the public interest law firm Judicial Watch.

Judicial Watch Chairman and General Counsel Larry Klayman termed Mueller’s comments Wednesday, that open criticism of him and other top FBI brass was welcome, were nothing more than "politically convenient statements.”

'They Got Caught'

"They said that because they got caught with their hands in the cookie jar,” declared Klayman, referring to a memo written by FBI legal counsel Coleen Rowley. She alleged in a memo that the FBI could have prevented the 9-11 attacks and that Mueller, though new to the job, has covered up for senior FBI officials.

Klayman said Mueller’s reorganization plan announced this week was noting more than "icing over a stale cake."

Wright produced a sworn statement relating to an FBI agent who refused to record a telephone conversation during the meeting with a suspect in an FBI criminal investigation related to terrorism.

Muslim Agent 'Does Not Record Another Muslim'!

The agent in question is quoted in two sworn statements, one by Wright and the other by retired agent Barry Carmody, as refusing to record the conversation because "a Muslim does not record another Muslim.”

Carmody’s statement said that refusal "may have negatively impacted the conduct of the FBI’s investigation. I informed FBI headquarters twice about this incident in 1998 and again in 2000, but I am aware of no disciplinary action being taken against him in this matter.”

Wright, whose whistle-blowing was first reported by NewsMax.com weeks ago, urged the Bush administration and Congress to "consider removing terrorism investigative matters from the hands of the FBI. For reasons of consistency, reliability and national security, these responsibilities should be assigned to a new federal Anti-Terrorism Agency.”

The assets of the Drug Enforcement Agency could be used to fund an anti-terrorism agency, he said. "Simply switch the terrorism responsibilities of the FBI with the nation’s illegal drug responsibilities.

FBI's Gross Incompetence

"Knowing what I know,” Wright continued, "I can confidently say that until the investigative responsibilities for terrorism are transferred from the FBI, I will not feel safe.”

The agent, stationed in Chicago and now demoted to "meaningless paper-pushing” work, according to Klayman, charged the FBI "cannot identify and prevent acts of terrorism against the United States and its citizens at home and abroad.”

Even worse, he said, there is "virtually no effort on the part of the FBI’s International Terrorism Unit to neutralize known and suspected terrorists residing in the United States. Unfortunately, more terrorist attacks against the American interests, coupled with the loss of American lives, will have to occur before those in power give this matter the urgent attention it deserves.”

By phone from his law office in Chicago, Wright’s lead attorney, David Schippers, who represented the House Judiciary Committee in its impeachment of Bill Clinton, chided the FBI for dropping the ball in dealing with domestic and international radical Islamic "charities" that were laundering money on American soil through U.S. financial institutions and other channels.

Stopping Muslim Terrorism Isn't P.C.

Had the bureau not been cowed by "political correctness,” Schippers said, the money for much terrorist activity "would have been cut off.”

In his opening statement, Judicial Watch’s Klayman said the FBI had threatened Wright with his job if he were to go ahead and tell his story either in media statements or in a book he has been writing.

When Wright attempted to travel to Washington on his own time to meet with members of Congress about the FBI’s incompetence and dereliction of duty regarding terrorism during the week after Sept. 11, his attorneys were threatened by the Justice Department, which oversees the bureau.

Klayman says Attorney General John Ashcroft should be required to answer for that interference. Moreover, the FBI informed Wright he could not travel outside of the Chicago division without the express permission of the bureau.

The Judicial Watch counsel said the FBI did have intelligence about terrorist activity planned against the World Trade Center and "other monuments.”

Wright listed several major failures of the FBI. They included lack of high-quality managers and modern computer technology, failure to modernize investigative objectives to deal with the new terrorist threat, too many investigative violations, incompetent managers not held accountable for their mistakes, an internal affairs unit that was "bias[ed] and unfair” to whistle-blowers and others, criminal conflicts that have "contributed to the preventable deaths of American citizens," and FBI duplication of the investigative jurisdictions of other federal law enforcement agencies such as the DEA and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.

"I love America, and likewise I love the FBI, particularly its purpose and mission” Wright told reporters at the National Press Club, "However, the mission has been seriously jeopardized to the point where American lives have been needlessly lost.”

At the news conference, in answer to questions from NewsMax.com, Klayman said he hoped Congress would use its subpoena powers to require Wright and responsible officials to testify.

He also told NewsMax that if the FBI tries to drive Wright out of the bureau by isolating him and passing him up for promotions, "he will be a rich man,” because Judicial Watch would take necessary legal action to see that the powers that be do not get away with this familiar bureaucratic tactic of retaliation.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alqaida; espionagelist; fbi; inexcusablescrewups; terrorism; terrorwar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
To: ALL
NOBODY is doing their job! I DEMAND to know WHY!!! I fear a complete house cleaning is in order. NO Republicans, NO Democrats...A CONSERVATIVE party--with a clear mission ststement and job performance requirements (like a Contract with America II)--running in 2004 under the emergence of some sort of a "Constitutional Revoultion" may be the way to stop the bleeding.
21 posted on 05/30/2002 9:34:22 PM PDT by Captainpaintball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
I have a simple solution, my good Captainpaintball.
Bring back the jury system, so we can get rid of bad laws.
22 posted on 05/30/2002 9:41:53 PM PDT by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Captainpaintball
I like your style!
23 posted on 05/30/2002 9:55:46 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: exodus
Dont you dare exit now, exodus! Love you!
24 posted on 05/30/2002 9:57:07 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: exodus
The FBI is under the direct control of the President.

I guess. I’d say they’re under semi-direct control, but I understand what you mean.

The local agents aren't the only problem.
The leadership is corrupt.

The FBI is a Federal Bureaucracy. They exist to exist, and thrive. Furthermore, they are a highly politicized Federal Bureaucracy, which means that they must satisfy the politics/politicians of the day to survive and thrive… which is their goal, IMO.

I think of them as a baby. They eat and poop and cry and grow. That’s what they do. It is silly to complain about their eating, pooping, crying, and growing because that is simply ALL they can do. That is their purpose. That is the nature of the entity you are dealing with.

I get frustrated with them too. If you want to cancel/decrease the regular feedings, which would supposedly decrease the pooping, and stop the growing, I might be in agreement - understanding that the crying will probably get exponentially louder. OTOH, if you just want to criticize someone because the infant is crying… I don’t know what to say. That’s what it does. As long as you feed it, it will grow and cry for more food and on and on… you know.

Bush didn't fire even one man..
The President didn't do his job.

Well, there is that little detail… hopefully somebody sees some reason to keep the "kid" around. I don't at this point, but nobody asked me...

25 posted on 05/30/2002 9:57:27 PM PDT by thatsnotnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Washington_minuteman
If you can be minute man, can I be second lady?

That will get my enimies all upset!

On to Valley Forge!

26 posted on 05/30/2002 9:59:16 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: exodus
You probably could share blame back to Lincoln, but would it be accurate? Exactly what was the problem Bush had plenty of time to fix?
27 posted on 05/30/2002 10:03:49 PM PDT by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tgslTakoma
The FBI suffers from the same thing alot of bureaucracies do...Micromanaging. I've seen it in my own state agency. The people at the top don't trust the guy at the bottom to do his job and continually second-guess, and stifle any productivity/creativity.
28 posted on 05/30/2002 10:23:54 PM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jo
I'm still here, my lady.
29 posted on 05/30/2002 10:26:07 PM PDT by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: thatsnotnice
I understand that government organizations grow and gain power for seemingly no reason at all. Republicans do too. Stopping that growth was the mantra that gained the Republicans control of the House and Senate.

The President is the Executive. He doesn't have to answer to anyone as to the use of his power. Bush, instead of working to protect the country, has been playing politics. That's inexcusable to me.
30 posted on 05/30/2002 10:34:36 PM PDT by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: swheats
Exactly what was the problem Bush had plenty of time to fix?
# 27 by swheats
********************

Bush had plenty of time to remove corrupt FBI men.
Bush had plenty of time to remove corrupt ATF men.
Bush had plenty of time to make our airlines secure.
Bush had plenty of time to remove the Islamic terrorists who were in our country.

31 posted on 05/30/2002 10:42:49 PM PDT by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: swheats
You probably could share blame back to Lincoln, but would it be accurate?
# 27 by swheats
********************

Yes.

32 posted on 05/30/2002 10:44:11 PM PDT by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Commander8
Where is J. Edgar Hoover when we need him?

Being fitted for a darling blue evening gown with matching heels and bag.

33 posted on 05/30/2002 10:46:38 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
The FBI suffers from the same thing alot of bureaucracies do...Micromanaging. I've seen it in my own state agency. The people at the top don't trust the guy at the bottom to do his job and continually second-guess, and stifle any productivity/creativity.
# 28 by mass55th
********************

That's not acceptable to me, even if it's true.
There is no excuse for highly trained men to fight each other instead of working together. There's no excuse for any President to allow infighting in such a critical area.

34 posted on 05/30/2002 10:48:48 PM PDT by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Texasforever
You gotta love him.
35 posted on 05/30/2002 10:49:16 PM PDT by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Betty Jo
"Fire them all!"

One question for you?

True or false !

It was against the law for the FBI to spy on anyone in the USA pre-9-11-01 without proof of a crime and a court order?

If you answer this correctly your comments above will seem ignorant of the facts !

36 posted on 05/30/2002 10:51:57 PM PDT by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: america-rules
True or false !
It was against the law for the FBI to spy on anyone in the USA
pre-9-11-01 without proof of a crime and a court order?
# 36 by america-rules
********************

The rules change so often that I wouldn't swear either way.

However, even if the law says that the FBI can spy on a citizen without a court order, it's still illegal.

37 posted on 05/30/2002 11:00:09 PM PDT by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: exodus
OMG You can't be serious. What did you think, that after the 37 days of a contested election; Or working with a skeleton staff because his people were not confirmed by the Senate in a timely manner; Or the Crisis of the downing of the EP3 plane; Or the auditing of Executive Orders to see which needed immediate overturning; Or any of the numerous issues the Dems brought before him to deal with, that he would just drop his agenda?

At what point do you think he created a to-do list of "heads that would roll" once he was in office? The Dems in our Congress has done everything in their power to keep Bush off balance and disoriented. Thank God their strategy has rebounded back to them.

38 posted on 05/30/2002 11:03:25 PM PDT by swheats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: exodus
However, even if the law says that the FBI can spy on a citizen without a court order, it's still illegal.

Once again you are captive to post Church Commission dogma. There is nothing at all to prevent the FBI, CIA OR any national security apparatus from "spying". That is their job. Just as the pre-Church FBI had Carte' Blanche to infiltrate and "spy" on communist organizations and fronts, the FBI is justified to do that with terrorist organizations and fronts. The FBI was never conceived to be a law enforcement agency in the first place. Its original mission was to PREVENT assaults on national security. Muller re-organization announcement has placed the FBI back into that mission.

39 posted on 05/30/2002 11:08:09 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: swheats
"...At what point do you think he created a to-do list of "heads that would roll" once he was in office? The Dems in our Congress has done everything in their power to keep Bush off balance and disoriented. Thank God their strategy has rebounded back to them.
# 38 by swheats
********************

No matter what the Democrats "did" to Bush, the President has a job to do. Out of all the scary details the new President had to deal with, the security of the nation is the most urgent.

Everyone here on these threads knew that Clinton had destroyed our security infrastructure. I've talked with others about the dangers the Islamic terrorists posed to us. Do you think Bush wasn't as well informed as we were?

Fine, Bush had thousands of little details to resolve to consolidate his chances for re-election. I already said that Bush was playing politics instead of doing his job.

I'm just an ordinary citizen, though better informed than most due to my interest in the workings of my country. I wouldn't have waited until after the election to decide what I was going to do, and I don't have a staff to research the issues like Bush has.

40 posted on 05/30/2002 11:40:09 PM PDT by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson