Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The First Church of Costco
The Wall Street Journal ^ | Thursday, May 30, 2002

Posted on 05/30/2002 8:46:27 AM PDT by TroutStalker

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:46:33 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The Good Book instructs us to render unto Caesar what is his. But what do you do when Caesar casts his greedy eye on your local church -- in order to replace it with a discount retailer?

This tale comes from Orange County, California, once known as Reagan Country. On Tuesday night the Cypress City Council voted 4-0 to invoke its powers of eminent domain to seize land owned by the Cottonwood Christian Center, which would then be sold to Costco. The growing non-denominational Christian church had bought the mostly vacant land in 1999 because its existing building was bursting at the seams.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cottonwood; landgrab
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last
To: TroutStalker
Boy, this one's a STINKER!!!-- and the worst excuse for the blatant misuse of emminent domain.
21 posted on 05/30/2002 1:54:55 PM PDT by let freedom sing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King; All
That is why property taxes are immoral, unethical and should be illegal. By having property taxes, it means the city/state has an inherent interest in all the private property which is in direct contradictions to the canon of a free society.

There are many other proper forms of taxation, but of course the absolute worst has been implemented.
22 posted on 05/30/2002 1:57:01 PM PDT by borntodiefree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Tactical Thunder
Good for you. I went to costco.com and selected the customer service section. There is a place there where you can enter questions. My question was "Are you ready to lose hundreds of customers?"

Maybe they should get more of those questions...

23 posted on 05/30/2002 2:07:26 PM PDT by HeadOn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker;RonDog;generalissimoduane;Dog;DogGone
The Wall Street Journal(good pick)--

City of Cypress willing to 'pony up' ~$14.5 million in the hopes of attracting Costco(not a done deal) when the church will attract people which will cause Costco to purchase a different parcel at a better price.

The City Council of Cypress has their 'collective' head where the sun don't shine; but, then, they can never pass on the opportunity to spend taxpayers' money. Watch the 'deal' Costco pulls once the 'city' has the property. They will probably want a 10-year property tax exemption just for coming into Cypress. Remember, these are the same type of geniuses that came up with California's energy deregulation plan that would somehow outwit the energy experts. Yeah, right!!!

24 posted on 05/30/2002 2:18:57 PM PDT by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
Costco should have to buy six churches, or none.
25 posted on 05/30/2002 2:56:54 PM PDT by Nick Danger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: borntodiefree
Property taxes are only a small part of the equation. A store such as Costco has the potential to generate close to $1 million a year in sales tax revenues for the city, while the property taxes probably won’t exceed $25,000.
26 posted on 05/30/2002 3:26:19 PM PDT by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: South40
"$1 million a year in sales tax revenues for the city..."

State sales tax, county property tax, no city sales tax. Costco will probably have more employees than the church, and require more 'city services', and thus state and county will probably do some 'revenue sharing'--not nearly at the level of 'charitable giving' as the church.

27 posted on 05/30/2002 4:12:28 PM PDT by d14truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: d14truth
Exactamundo!
28 posted on 05/30/2002 4:15:18 PM PDT by South40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Really? My neighbor took me to Costco for the first time. Some of their prices looked great but my husband is not totally convinced to join as he says shopping there would cause one to spend more money.
29 posted on 05/30/2002 4:34:50 PM PDT by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
That's right, no broken case sales.
30 posted on 05/30/2002 4:46:10 PM PDT by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
Hmmm, I could see the environmentalist using this tactic to their advantage as well. Let's say there are some homesteads in isolated areas in the mountian regions of our country and they want all property owners out of a certain area in order to make the land a "National Park". Could this method be used to add more land into the government's hands and less for individual landowners?

I'm not liking the looks of this...

31 posted on 05/30/2002 4:57:27 PM PDT by spokanite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: infowarrior
a county govt. is going to do a questionable (in my opinion illegal) eminent domain on some of my land. I've talked to several lawyers and the consensus of everyone is that if they want it, they can take it. All you can do is negotiate on the price but you basically have no choice about selling.
32 posted on 05/30/2002 4:58:25 PM PDT by staytrue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: hsmomx3
Really?

No, my mistake since I researched it a bit. It was Sol Price, founder of Price Club which was acquired by Costco about 10 years ago. (But good luck trying to google any references to his Communist Party membership, which I had seen mentioned a number of times back in the 80s when being a Communist wasn't considered any different than being a Presbytarian. Ah, those were the days!)

33 posted on 05/30/2002 7:01:35 PM PDT by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: South40
Property taxes are only a small part of the equation. A store such as Costco has the potential to generate close to $1 million a year in sales tax revenues for the city, while the property taxes probably won’t exceed $25,000.

I don't know how California works, but only $25,000 in annual property taxes would be fantastic, considering the property alone, with no buildings, costs $14 million. That's a property tax rate of 0.0178% or $1.78 mills (here in CT, we measure property taxes in mills, which is how much you pay for each thousand dollars of value).

1.78 mills is incredibly low. Here in Greenwich, our mill rate is about $11, whereas in poorer parts of the state, the mill rate is much higher, for instance, in Bridgeport, it's $65. So in Greenwich, a $14 million property would be assessed at $9.8 million (assessments are 70% of the market value) and taxed at $11 per $1000, or $107,800 for the $14 million property. In Bridgeport, annual taxes would be six times as much, or around $640,000 per year.

Sales taxes are usually administered by the state and collected by the state, not the county. Thus, the local municipality would likely not derive much benefit from the sales taxes.

34 posted on 05/30/2002 7:48:50 PM PDT by Koblenz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
Every other business in reality, not in effect, as well as every other property owner SUBSIDIZES GOVERNMENT, AND IT'S INSTITUTIONS....

Every business and individual who pays taxes pays for government services, true. And the government provides services -- police, fire, a monetary system, defense, a court system, an enforcer of property rights -- that are absolutely essential. Problem is, they also provide a slew of services that they have no business providing.

The collection system is messed up, sure, but no system is going to be perfect. But when the government devises a system, whether it's an income tax system, a property tax system, or a sales tax system, it should levy these taxes fairly, and not give one group a break over the others because they are more moral or connected or whatever. In a sales tax scheme, all should be taxes, income taxes should be applied on a flat structure, and property taxes should be levied against all property owners, whether they be a brothel or a church.

35 posted on 05/30/2002 7:52:54 PM PDT by Koblenz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Nick Danger
LOL!
36 posted on 05/30/2002 7:58:36 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Koblenz
No, because if you tax the church, you are essentially forcing them, to tax their parishoners, in effect, taxing the exercise of their worship.

And as far back as you care to go, that is, decidedly Un-American.

37 posted on 05/31/2002 4:39:44 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: hobbes1
There is a new law (Our Church has just informed us) That churches that own over 15 acers have to start paying property taxes on the land. This may be in Indiana only however, our church will have to start paying taxes on the land we own. Since we are part owners of a summer camp it puts us well over 15 acers.
38 posted on 05/31/2002 4:46:07 AM PDT by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Khepera
Would it not be easier to set up a separate entity to own most of the 15 acres, and leave the church Tax free ?
39 posted on 05/31/2002 4:54:45 AM PDT by hobbes1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: TroutStalker
History of the case, copies of the lawsuits, etc.... Cottonwood.org
40 posted on 05/31/2002 5:12:38 AM PDT by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson