While President Bush is doing very well with a 70%+ approval rating, he has done little to pass this approval rating on to his party. It may not even be possible to do so.
Bush's popularity is based almost entirely on his excellent war leadership. Imagine if their were no war - would conservatives have accepted Bush's spending spree, signing of CFR, etc. and maintain Bush's high approval ratings of their were no war? Should his excellent leadership end for any reason, Bush's administration could suffer politically.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
To: Zack Nguyen
Bush probably would have fought harder if he were not so worried about maintaining support for the war on terror. He knows how fickle the public is. And please don't forget the Jeffors defection.What kind of kick back has Jeffords recieved? When Bush took office pubbies had a slim control of both houses. I do recall the pubbies not being very supportive of the administration. I am relly mad at congressman porkers who claim to be conservative.
82 posted on
05/29/2002 9:46:02 AM PDT by
dalebert
To: Zack Nguyen
Imagine if their [sic] were no war...
BZZZZZZT! Can't do that. Maybe if those tall pretty buildings were still standing in Manhattan I could. But they're gone cuz some mean ol' Muslims knocked them down and killed a whole lot of Americans.
There are no "ifs" in this situation, only what "is."
If "if" were a fifth, we'd all be drunk.
102 posted on
05/29/2002 10:01:43 AM PDT by
rdb3
To: Zack Nguyen
All this would be relevant if the election were to be held tomorrow. As it is, the election is still over five months away. A lot could happen before then... particularly on the world stage...
To: Zack Nguyen
Strange, I read a review of the polls which suggested, just the opposite, that the Republicans were much more likely to motivate their bases, as opposed to the Democrats whose base approval rating was much lower.
128 posted on
05/29/2002 10:23:48 AM PDT by
Eva
To: Zack Nguyen
There is something missing in the piece: logic. We should all stay home in November because we are dissatisfied with pork barrel spending and the fact that the demonrat sin-ate is holding up and rejecting conservative judges. If we stay home, we will get more demonrats in the congress leading to more pork barrel spending and less chance of getting conservative judges. Really smart.
To: Zack Nguyen
I'd never give the option to Democrats. It is that simple. I do not care who is running against the Dems, I am voting against the Dems systematicaly.
Enough said.
To: Zack Nguyen
Bump-er-rooney!
To: Zack Nguyen
I don't know where to start here. I'm in full agreement with Zack on this. I'm really sick and tired of Republican whinings of "What would you rather have? A bunch of Democrats in office?" In regards to voting; when in the hell did the choice come down between either stabbing yourself in the left or the right eye? I choose neither! Yes, yes lets drone on about how third party voters are throwing their votes away. My favorite line came from a conservative caller to Sean Hannity's radio program. "Having principles is fine but we have to win". Thank God our founding Fathers never abandoned their principles as quickly as this caller has. Sad as it is to say maybe the Republican party needs to die a quick death. There is little to distinguish them from their brother Democrats now. Hopefully a coalition of freedom loving people could raise a new party from the ashes. One that really was conservative versus the one that now falsely claims to be.
To: Zack Nguyen;Avoiding_Sulla
Deroy Murdock--'A Call to Arms' or 'A Call for Surrender'?
Jim Jeffords, Pat Leahy, Tom Daschle and the 'Willing accomplices' in the media and education establishments are the 'Worst Enemies'. Until we servants 'lead' the GOP the GOP cannot lead us. Where is the 'RIGHT' press? Where are the 'RIGHT' teachers? Where IS the 'tax-controlled' church? Giving up freedom for security, having neither.
To: Zack Nguyen
Didn't vote GOP last time (or the time before that, either) and sure as hell won't the next time.
Why should I? I want a much smaller government, not a much larger one.
To: Zack Nguyen
But there is a war and if algore was elected all you morons would see the difference between a democrat and a republican.
245 posted on
05/29/2002 7:44:08 PM PDT by
DWC
To: Zack Nguyen
I'll vote Republican just to keep the RATS from repealing the tax cuts.
You know if they win that is the first thing they will do.
Dashole has already said as much.
248 posted on
05/29/2002 7:55:23 PM PDT by
drq
To: Zack Nguyen
He has them spitting on both the far left and the far right.
He must be doing something correctly. This is not a poll driven pres! I for one, "appreciate that"!
To: Zack Nguyen
The most amazing thing about this article is that National Review seems surprised at all of this.It was obvious before Dubya even won the primary that he only looked conservative when compared to algore. But, when you back off and look at where he sets on the whole scale, there is no doubt that he is the best Democrat that has run or won the Presidency in years.
The following is a scale that I created prior to the Presidential election. Many head-in-the-sand Republicans ranted and raved at what this scale said. I wonder how they feel today.
To: Zack Nguyen
Bush is pulling out all stops to win firm control of the House and Senate. Once the Republicans are in charge, they will reduce farm spending by 90%. That's the plan. Trust him. Vote Republican and just wait and see!
To: Zack Nguyen
Beyond speaking softly in his bully pulpit, Bush never has touched his veto pen.Reagan was brandishing his veto pen before he was even sworn in. Jesus, George, VETO SOMETHING!
273 posted on
05/31/2002 3:28:29 PM PDT by
Stultis
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-37 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson