Of course, Mary makes no mention of the TYPE of women that the perpetrator was after. Every account I've read said these women were fair(light hair and eyes) and tall, filled out sort of build. Aren't these type of people not only looking for oppurtunity, but a particular type of woman? Chandra just doesn't seem to fit with what he typically attacks. Now that's all said even BEFORE we talk about Condit and his affair. The stuff I see in this article is really disgusting to this young woman's memory. Certainly she wasn't a stand up sort of gal, but she was young and still making the kind of mistakes we come to regret when we are older. It's a shame she never got that chance to regret these things because she got involved with the wrong man and probably made the mistake of telling him something that could incriminate him(like a pregnancy) and made the mistake of meeting him before she had a chance to tell anyone else. Poor thing, she probablythought at worst that the old man was going to implore her to have an abortion. Just a little speculating on my part.
God rest your soul Chandra(and any other soul that may have been taken with you).
One thing I would point out ... Mary Mostert is a 50ish to 60ish woman who for many years edited the Web Site for Michael Reagan. She has written many insightful articles on a wide variety of issues. She tends to be extremely conservative. She cut Clinton NO slack.
If you check Reagan's web site (not kept current since she left), you might find a variety of articles that she wrote. And if you are conservative ... you probably would like the tone of the majority of her articles.
I too disagree with her writing her ... but have read enough of her articles to give her a fair hearing, and given her "track record", I won't "dis" her, because I think that she is calling it as she sees it, and isn't going to give it a different flavor because the "perp" is a scum-bag Democrat.
Just my opinion. One article (this one) - won't cause me to dump reading Mary Mostert.
Mike