Replies

One thing I would point out ... Mary Mostert is a 50ish to 60ish woman who for many years edited the Web Site for Michael Reagan. She has written many insightful articles on a wide variety of issues. She tends to be extremely conservative. She cut Clinton NO slack.

If you check Reagan's web site (not kept current since she left), you might find a variety of articles that she wrote. And if you are conservative ... you probably would like the tone of the majority of her articles.

I too disagree with her writing her ... but have read enough of her articles to give her a fair hearing, and given her "track record", I won't "dis" her, because I think that she is calling it as she sees it, and isn't going to give it a different flavor because the "perp" is a scum-bag Democrat.

Just my opinion. One article (this one) - won't cause me to dump reading Mary Mostert.

Mike

I emailed Mary reminding her that the entire Clinton cabinet announced to the world that they too belived Bill Clinton when he said he did not have sex with THAT woman.

She immediately emailed me back asking for any circumstantial proof of my opinion that he was guilty. She also mentioned that she was a republican.

I suggest that republican on the coasts is far left to most of us.

If anyone can point to any aspect of innocence in Condit's behaviour since the knowledge that he had been involved with Chandra, I'd like to hear of it.

What is Chief Ramsey´s definition of "clue?"

Whatever the definition, it is most probably glazed.