Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 05/29/2002 5:25:10 AM PDT by Starmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: Starmaker
Sadly, Mary forgot to mention that Condit has an alter-ego who likes to ride motorcyles with Hell's Angels bikers, professed he had a disabled wife who appears perfectly healthy, wears disguises when meeting his other mistresses, and is into kinky sex (presumably tying people up and grooving on ladies' underwear). He has no alibi for the day Chandra disappeared and his interview with Connie Chung was a study in dancing with legalese, which (being not quite as bright as the Clinton's) he was unable to master. He never leveled with Chandra's parents until he was forced to, has yet to give a concise interview to the police, and had the stupidity to offer a $10,000 reward about a disappearance and crime he claimed to have no knowledge about, prior to the discovery that something had happened. He's one messed up guy, probably socio-pathetic--but she failed to mention that, too.
35 posted on 05/29/2002 7:25:22 AM PDT by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
A spinmeister, first class. DC police, "hot pursuit of Condit"... Thats a far stretch in anyones spin machine.
36 posted on 05/29/2002 7:26:41 AM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
As a woman, the situation has all the earmarks of a one-sided romantic interest...As a woman, this article is poorly written...
41 posted on 05/29/2002 8:11:39 AM PDT by Rudder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
How many 54-year-old busy, successful men who have been married to the same woman for thirty-six years and have grown children are talking about having babies with some chick younger than their children when they are over sixty and retired?

Gimme a break!--did this silly woman grow up in a convent?

46 posted on 05/29/2002 10:24:56 AM PDT by scholar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
Correct on the lunacy of the DC police in taking so long to search Rock Creek Park, and when they finally did search it, missing the most obvious places to hide a body.

Totally incorrect on support of Condit. Condit did himself in by not owning up to his relationship. Condit is either directly linked to Levy's death, or one of the most incredibly unlucky schmucks to come down the pike in a long time. I think he told Chandra he'd meet her at the Kringle Mansion & did so. If he didn't kill her or have her killed, then perhaps it was a random attack after his meeting her at the manse and he was too afraid he'd be the likely subject if he told police he'd met her there just before she went missing. So he's either a murderer or incredibly unlucky. But "innocent," he ain't. Just my 2 cents.

47 posted on 05/29/2002 10:25:22 AM PDT by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
CONDIT-LEVY DEATH TIMELINE
49 posted on 05/29/2002 2:05:38 PM PDT by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
Hey Mary! con-DID-it!
54 posted on 05/29/2002 3:47:48 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
Do you suppose she is s member of NOW?
55 posted on 05/29/2002 3:53:36 PM PDT by wingnuts'nbolts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
Sorry, Ms. Mostert. There are times I whole-heartedly agree with you..........but this isn't one of 'em.

No, Ms. Mostert, what you are ignoring is the incredibly slick, slimy nature of Condit. That man and Bill Clinton are two peas in the same pod: soulless, hedonistic, sociopaths; pathological liars.

He has managed to pull the wool over your eyes, Ms. Mostert, but don't feel too bad about it. He fooled hundreds of thousands of voters...........repeatedly. He has his kids snowed (I guarantee you that those kids' mom had MUCH more to do with their upbringing and character than "dad"; you can absolutely bank on that). This is a man into kinky sex, not just sex with younger women in a vain attempt to reclaim his lost youth (and she wouldn't have given him a second glance if he'd been a carpenter by trade..........that tell you something?).

Condit cloaked himself in the mantle of "defender of family values" while he blithely f**ked anything in a skirt that would hold still long enough. The sordid details of his "lifestyle" have been publicized enough by now; I'm sure we've all read them. THAT, Ms. Mostert, is ample evidence of a supreme liar; a consummate con man............exactly like Bill Clinton.

I pride myself on my ability to "read" people, Ms. Mostert, and I'm damned good at it. My livelihood depends on it. The first time I laid eyes on Bill Clinton, he fairly screamed "dirtbag; slimeball; shake my hand, but count your fingers afterward." When I saw Condit's interview with Connie Chung, I had exactly the same reaction.

I can read a liar a mile away............and Clinton AND Condit are liars. In fact, Condit is far better at it than Clinton (who was so transparent in his lying it was worse than pathetic; those who didn't see it chose not to see it.........he's that bad at it).

.......and just like Bill Clinton, I am not sure it will ever be proven, but I'm convinced that both men are directly responsible for the deaths of others. They are too effeminate, weak, and cowardly to "do the dirty deed" themselves, but you can DAMNED well rest assured, once and for all, that these bastards had others killed by surrogates for the slimiest of reasons: saving their sorry political a**es.

56 posted on 05/29/2002 4:12:13 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
***And, why, do you suppose, it took the Washington Police Department TEN WEEKS to decide to search Rock Creek Park, when they had in their possession all that time Chandra´s computer showing her last action on it was accessing the Rock Creek Park Web site's home page?***

My recollection is that when computer activity was publicly revealed the police were asked if they had searched Rock Creek Park in particular because Chandra had been at that website. I further recall they seemed to not take this bit of info as a serious lead, but commenced the more "intense" search using cadets, etc. under the pressure of public awareness of Chandra's web activity. I still remember the contemporary reaction to the "search" as a joke and many people believeing it was entirely possible she was, in fact, there at the park.

60 posted on 05/29/2002 6:25:29 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
***Chad, 34, worked as an assistant to Davis on agricultural and legislative issues related to California's Central Valley. The job paid $110,000 a year. Cadee Condit, 25, was a special assistant overseeing day-to-day operations at Davis's private office. She was paid $52,000 a year...***

I'm a bit surprised Mary assumes the Condit kids are qualified for these positions. She must have missed their respective appearances on Larry King!

61 posted on 05/29/2002 6:34:03 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
The admission of a man who attacked two women at knife point in the same area Chandra Levy´s computer indicated she was researching the day of her disappearance is not a clue? What is Chief Ramsey´s definition of "clue?"

How about: Miss Scarlet, with the Rope, In the Dining Room.

64 posted on 05/29/2002 7:34:17 PM PDT by Goldi-Lox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
Where has this idiot been? It was reported over and over and over! The DC unpolice did tell us about this guy and the other girls that were attacked!
Chandra didn't go jogging alone in the park because she was afraid, but hey, don't let the facts confuse a RAT trying to protect one of their own.
67 posted on 05/30/2002 9:54:24 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
How many 54-year-old busy, successful men who have been married to the same woman for thirty-six years and have grown children are talking about having babies with some chick younger than their children when they are over sixty and retired?

Common, give me a break.

He lives in DC, and was porking anything that wore a bra; she's living in luxury in Kalif, probably fogged on Prozac. Yeah, great marriage.

74 posted on 05/31/2002 2:46:25 PM PDT by aShepard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
I believe Gary Condit – not the Washington police rumors, not the media, not the women trying to ruin Condit. I believe Gary Condit because his family, especially his children, believe in him.

Bwhahahaha! I hadn't actually read the article all the way through until now. What a ditz.

80 posted on 05/31/2002 3:23:53 PM PDT by Plummz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Starmaker
"What really happened between Chandra Levy and Gary Condit? Who knows?"

Who knows? How about Gary Condit?

"However, any man who has grown children with enough character to resign high paying jobs in support of their father, has a father who has earned their support, ..."

Really? Maybe they were urged to resign so that the "scandal" wouldn't spill over and become an embarrassment for their favorite DemonRAT Governor of California.

81 posted on 05/31/2002 3:34:50 PM PDT by StormEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson