Posted on 05/29/2002 5:25:09 AM PDT by Starmaker
Ted Bundy didn't have a high profile political career. As Clinton has shown, adultery is not a career killer, but covering up the adultery is. That is what Condit is guilty of. He had no part in this murder. What would be his MO? Preventing a known secret from leaking out to a public already jaded by Clinton?
There are enough homeless manurebags running around loose in that park.
I only follow this for the entertainment value. I don't meant that anyone's death is funny, not at all. It's the media treatment that's making it so.
It seems the entire family was behind her affair with a Congressman. Her aunt even told her how to arrange his closets. The fact that he was married didn't seem to bother them at all. The first thing they talked about in the early press conferences was her affair with Condit. The first thing they talked about after the body was found was...Condit!
Gimme a break!--did this silly woman grow up in a convent?
Totally incorrect on support of Condit. Condit did himself in by not owning up to his relationship. Condit is either directly linked to Levy's death, or one of the most incredibly unlucky schmucks to come down the pike in a long time. I think he told Chandra he'd meet her at the Kringle Mansion & did so. If he didn't kill her or have her killed, then perhaps it was a random attack after his meeting her at the manse and he was too afraid he'd be the likely subject if he told police he'd met her there just before she went missing. So he's either a murderer or incredibly unlucky. But "innocent," he ain't. Just my 2 cents.
I wonder the same thing, but I also wonder why with all the jogging, attacking, etc. going on on this road, why NO ONE came acrossed a body (or the smell of one). If Chandra's body was killed on the spot where she was found, then there is no way in heck that it would have been "over looked".
a shallow grave does not do much to hide the stench - ask any police officer or ME
One of the best things I like about FP is outstanding and very funny photographs. This one should be nominated for the FP Hall of Fame.
Good job and thanks!
No, Ms. Mostert, what you are ignoring is the incredibly slick, slimy nature of Condit. That man and Bill Clinton are two peas in the same pod: soulless, hedonistic, sociopaths; pathological liars.
He has managed to pull the wool over your eyes, Ms. Mostert, but don't feel too bad about it. He fooled hundreds of thousands of voters...........repeatedly. He has his kids snowed (I guarantee you that those kids' mom had MUCH more to do with their upbringing and character than "dad"; you can absolutely bank on that). This is a man into kinky sex, not just sex with younger women in a vain attempt to reclaim his lost youth (and she wouldn't have given him a second glance if he'd been a carpenter by trade..........that tell you something?).
Condit cloaked himself in the mantle of "defender of family values" while he blithely f**ked anything in a skirt that would hold still long enough. The sordid details of his "lifestyle" have been publicized enough by now; I'm sure we've all read them. THAT, Ms. Mostert, is ample evidence of a supreme liar; a consummate con man............exactly like Bill Clinton.
I pride myself on my ability to "read" people, Ms. Mostert, and I'm damned good at it. My livelihood depends on it. The first time I laid eyes on Bill Clinton, he fairly screamed "dirtbag; slimeball; shake my hand, but count your fingers afterward." When I saw Condit's interview with Connie Chung, I had exactly the same reaction.
I can read a liar a mile away............and Clinton AND Condit are liars. In fact, Condit is far better at it than Clinton (who was so transparent in his lying it was worse than pathetic; those who didn't see it chose not to see it.........he's that bad at it).
.......and just like Bill Clinton, I am not sure it will ever be proven, but I'm convinced that both men are directly responsible for the deaths of others. They are too effeminate, weak, and cowardly to "do the dirty deed" themselves, but you can DAMNED well rest assured, once and for all, that these bastards had others killed by surrogates for the slimiest of reasons: saving their sorry political a**es.
Was she aware of the misleading (false) timeline?
Lol... classic!
My recollection is that when computer activity was publicly revealed the police were asked if they had searched Rock Creek Park in particular because Chandra had been at that website. I further recall they seemed to not take this bit of info as a serious lead, but commenced the more "intense" search using cadets, etc. under the pressure of public awareness of Chandra's web activity. I still remember the contemporary reaction to the "search" as a joke and many people believeing it was entirely possible she was, in fact, there at the park.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.