Replies

Yes.. SarahW, you are right he (the jogger/walkman attacker) was walking around free at that time, but Albert Cook (miss id by Condit's Lawyer as Albert Clark) was on trial the first week of May in 2001, so he was sitting in jail when Chandra came up missing. Cook was an attacker/murderer... but the other guy who is in jail now did not rape or kill anyone and I doubt he would kill first then move into just attacking women. I mean serial killers do not get worse at it with each victim they only get better at it, the 2 attacks came after Chandra was already missing and now known as dead. Condit's Lawyer is trying to find anything he can of course to point suspicion away from Condit, but he should start looking into things before he publically announces a suspects name on tv. What a smuck! I just pray that they have some hard evidence in what they found around the remains. I am sure that they are really looking at Condit as the number one suspect, they just need to find that one thing that they can prove he did it. I think people will start talking since they now her have remains and it is a homicide case. There is no reason now to protect Condit no matter how they are protecting him. I am sure his people also have doubt's about his story and how little he is willing to share with the police.