Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SarahW
Yes.. SarahW, you are right he (the jogger/walkman attacker) was walking around free at that time, but Albert Cook (miss id by Condit's Lawyer as Albert Clark) was on trial the first week of May in 2001, so he was sitting in jail when Chandra came up missing. Cook was an attacker/murderer... but the other guy who is in jail now did not rape or kill anyone and I doubt he would kill first then move into just attacking women. I mean serial killers do not get worse at it with each victim they only get better at it, the 2 attacks came after Chandra was already missing and now known as dead. Condit's Lawyer is trying to find anything he can of course to point suspicion away from Condit, but he should start looking into things before he publically announces a suspects name on tv. What a smuck! I just pray that they have some hard evidence in what they found around the remains. I am sure that they are really looking at Condit as the number one suspect, they just need to find that one thing that they can prove he did it. I think people will start talking since they now her have remains and it is a homicide case. There is no reason now to protect Condit no matter how they are protecting him. I am sure his people also have doubt's about his story and how little he is willing to share with the police.
45 posted on 05/29/2002 9:10:47 AM PDT by stlnative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: brigette
Read somewhere yesterday that statistically women murder by someone they were "involved" with is more than the total of all other reasons combined. You can't tell me the police don't consider him a suspect.
46 posted on 05/29/2002 9:20:38 AM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: brigette; hoosiermama
There is no reason now to protect Condit no matter how they are protecting him. I am sure his people also have doubt's about his story and how little he is willing to share with the police.

Has he shown up on the House floor for votes yet? Is he at work at all, in his Capitol Hill office, sitting in committee hearings?? Or do y'all know, is he *in hiding* -- no one has seen hide ner hair?

48 posted on 05/29/2002 9:28:56 AM PDT by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: brigette; hoosiermama
Gainer said police are also searching for the yellow-gold initial ring that Levy usually wore. It was not found in her apartment and was not recovered in the park. The ring had a dark, flat surface, he said, and the initials "CL."

This sounds like a signet ring, I'm sure you've seen the kind, little flat surface for engraving. I've read from other posts that the ring described as the one she always wore had little diamond chips. You don't usually see diamond chips or gems on these signet rings, seems perfectly acceptable that Chandra would wear two. Is the lamestream just getting their facts wrong (what a surprise) on just which ring may have actually been found at the site?

50 posted on 05/29/2002 9:35:53 AM PDT by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: brigette
You should not assume that Ingmar was harmless because he failed to rape and/or kill the two known victims he attacked near Broad Branch road.

The totality of the picture shows that rape and/or worse was his intent, and that his intent was thwarted at crime scene "A", thereby precluding a crime scene "B". Chances for survival or escape are highest at the beginning of such attacks - and nearly negligible if the criminal is able to get you to crime scene "b".

The current expert wisdom is to struggle as loudly and as vigorously as possible in the beginning, and the chances of the criminal abandoning the attack go up and your chances of escape go up. A second bit of advice for victims is, every single moment be looking for an opportunity to escape.

He was unable to get the first victim off of the public path. She screamed. She fought. Both agree he ran off to avoid the high chance of discovery and capture. The second victim he was able to knock of the path and he rolled her down into the ravine, with a knife at her chin and a hand over her mouth to suppress her screams. She felt his grip loosen for a moment. Experts tell women to use a moment where he thinks he has you subdued, and lets his guard down. The second victim used this moment to pull free and RUN for her life. He could not catch her, and as she ran screaming, he high-tailed it into the woods. If he had not loosened his grip, she may have faced the same fate as Chandra. All we know for sure about Chandra is that she DID face crime scene B, whoever her killer was. She might have been one of young Gandeque's successes as he traveled the learning curve of men who commit these type of crimes. He might have lucked out with her. Maybe when he tackled her, she was dazed and unable to struggle as effectively as the others.

74 posted on 05/29/2002 11:36:19 AM PDT by SarahW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

To: brigette
Albert Cook didn't do this murder. But you are not correct about him being on trial May 1. He had not been arrested for any crime at the time Chandra was murdered.
159 posted on 06/01/2002 6:53:02 AM PDT by SarahW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson