To: kampeska
His point is accurate and valid. You can't argue with the low reproductive rate of Boomers.
Narcissism has it's price. It's called extinction.
13 posted on
05/30/2002 8:54:49 PM PDT by
Justa
To: Justa
His point is baby boomers suck. A country with 276,000,000 people in it is not becoming extinct. Leave people alone to reproduce as they want to. It is nobodies business but those who want to put someone else down. If you want to put me down, or my generation down, or anyone else down on some moronic basis that sucks. There are enough truely awful things around...lets concentrate on them.
14 posted on
05/31/2002 5:29:53 PM PDT by
kampeska
To: Justa
His point is accurate and valid. You can't argue with the low reproductive rate of Boomers.Yes, that is exactly my point. If the next few generations follow Baby Boomers' example, then there is no doubt at all that it is the end of the Western Civilization as we know it.
I have a problem with that since I am not a Baby Boomer, and in fact I am very young compared to other FReepers. I wouldn't like to live in a world that is vastly transformed from today, for worse rather than better.
To: Justa
Well, we did our part-- we're boomers and my husband and I have four children.
To: Justa
You can't argue with the low reproductive rate of Boomers. Narcissism has it's price. It's called extinction. They are call Boomers because of the high birth rates post WWII. That implies that the generation before the boomer were also narcissistic because they must have had a lower birth rate.
By this definition, any American who is not married with more than two children is a narcissist.
19 posted on
06/01/2002 12:08:42 PM PDT by
Doe Eyes
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson